Supporters of the Conservative Party frequently comment at Kiwiblog, often defending Colin Craig and his party, and often attacking anyone deemed critical. They even jump on attempts to just discuss the Conservative Party.
Yesterday on General Debate I posted:
The Conservative Party slogan is “Stand for Something”. Stand for what?
A genuine question for Conservative supporters – what do you thing the New Zealand Conservative Party stands for?
That comment was voted 13 down, 8 up. Simply asking questions about the Conservatives is seen as negative.
An early response from ‘Harriett':
What National USED to stand for!
No details with that.
There was ensuing discussion through the day but with little addressing of the question. I’ve skipped the attacks on Conservatives and looked for comments in support or defence plus reasonable criticism.
I quite like this bit of policy from the Conservatives.
The return to a single voter roll in New Zealand.
• There needs to be an end to the division of the voter roll on the basis of race. As this is a change to the way the people are represented we believe a binding referendum should be held to ratify this proposal.
‘Changeiscoming’ add to this:
Colville – Winston has the same position but he has had years to do something about it and he hasn’t. He is just talk and bluster.
Why are so many people here viciously against Colin Craig ?
What are they so afraid of ?
Colin Craig is not a queer, but is a married family orientated male. We know that this frowned upon today thanks to the social engineering of Helen Clark. Not what she wants for New Zealand. Must be female, homosexual, party and union members, public service employees, and TV entertainers, and never had to work for a living, but have been brought up on the public purse
The media are equally simplistic but that is par for the course.
The Conservative’s opposition to foreign investment makes them impossible for reasonable people to vote for. Not because it’s a bad policy, though it is an awful one. The problem is that it reveals their socialist mindset.
If a foreign investor buys assets and takes the resulting profits offshore, we haven’t lost anything because we have the money they used to buy the asset and can use that to create more wealth, in addition to the benefit of any jobs and taxes from the asset they now own.
We don’t want a party in Parliament that can’t understand basic economics and puts wealth redistribution ahead of wealth creation. There’s too much risk of them turning into another NZ First.
‘Manolo’ is a regular attacker of anything directed aty Conservatives and posted a typical diversionary diss:
Q: What do you think UnitedFuture stands for?
A: The highest bidder.
He claims to have no involvement with Conservatives but is a frequent defender or counter-attacker.
I am against Colin Craig and afraid that his whacky sense of politics will harm this country should he get the ability to influence any decisions.
That is not based on him being weird, we are all weird in our own little way because each of us is unique – but because he doesn’t know what the hell he is talking about.
For example, his criticism of the two referendums on smacking and assets sales. To make it clear I was against asset sales, but in favour of the antismacking legislation, but think it needs to be clearly defined, as at present it is not.
Colin Craig however critiques Key and the government for not listening to the two referendums on these issues and states he would alter the laws to suite them.
Both those referendums were poorly worded and poorly constructed, including questionable processes. John Key was perfectly right in rejecting and refusing to accept either of them.
And that is the difference. John Key probably doesn’t know the first thing about a well worded referendum but is astute enough to take advice, listen to it, and not be influenced by emotion. Colin Craig on the other hand is influenced by emotion, and prepared to act on a poorly worded documents, to change legislation. The implications of that sort of inefficiency, if he was allowed to influence our politics could be tremendous. I’m sure he’s a lovely man – but lovely men tend not to make good politicians.
Most critical comments were significantly down voted, with an exception from Chthoniid:
I’m not against Craig. I don’t intend voting for him (and as a voter in ECB I have that option)- but if he runs a successful electoral campaign to win 5% of the vote, or a seat, then good on him. He can be in Parliament.
What I object to is an inept campaign of petty manipulation, to try to get a free run at the ECB seat. I object to the assumption I’d vote for him when he’s made no effort to earn that vote. And if the Nats give in to that strategy, then that lack of principle will cost them my vote. I survived 9 years of Helengrad. I can survive 3 years of an squabbling, paralysed coalition of the left.
“I am against Colin Craig and afraid that his whacky sense of politics will harm this country should he get the ability to influence any decisions.”
What about the racist maori party ? You would rather them than Colin Craig saddle up next to the Nats? The racist party has done more harm than good to NZ. The brown mafia is alive and well in NZ. We need to biff the brown party in favour of the Conservatives. Colin will bring us back over to the right where the Nats should be. Thats the biggest mistake Key has made..taking the Nats to the centre left..absolute disaster.
Colin will sort it. Go Colin. All power to you.
Manolo supported this with “Well said, dirty harry.”
Redbaiter made a number of comments starting with:
Clintonoid- “I’m not against Craig.”
Like so many others who flock to this forum you identify yourself by your obsessive atheism and your hatred and intolerance of anyone who dares to be a Christian or advocate for Christianity.
Craig is proud to be Christian and that means he’ll never get your vote, no matter how he campaigns or what policies he promotes.
Be honest about it you horrible bigot. You’ll white ant Craig as much as you can because of you’re obsession with atheism.
Colin Craig’s principles are a strange mish-mash of left wing conservatism (much like NZ First), mixed up with a bit of Maori bashing and some god nuttery.
I’m expecting Colin Craig to attract some support from the fringe, but not enough to threaten the threshold or win an electorate. People considering voting for the conservatives should really consider NZ First instead, they have very similar policies and are much more likely to be actually in Parliament after the election.
You’re not getting the issue. NZF have been there for decades and are part of the system that has gradually lead us into totaliarian socialism. Yes, if you want to tell the current bunch of pollies that you’re happy with the socialist status quo then of course, vote for one of the regular parties.
However if you want to give the traditional parties and politicians a kick in the arse, you vote Conservative.
60,000 votes last election. That’s more than parties who have seats in parliament. They’ll get more this time.
Again- Saying CP party supporters should rather vote NZF is just missing the whole point.
He posted a several more times with a similar theme of ‘give the traditional parties and politicians a kick in the arse’ without promoting any positives for the Conservatives.
You’ve seen Flipper’s comments here. Other Nat supporters comments. You see they won’t fight the left. Many others see their lack of fight. Their groveling to what they call the middle, really an illusion manufactured by the left and their media propagandists.
Other people not similarly afflicted by this cowardice see the need to break out of this condition and they see the newcomer Craig as the most effective way (and possibly the only way) of telling the Nats they’ve had enough of their capitulation and the current progressive political condition of NZ.
He is anti-everything currently in politics and media and thinks/hopes Colin Craig will start his revolution.
The fact that National haven’t ruled a deal out makes it seem likely that if the poll numbers are close come election time then McCully will quietly step aside. Still might back-fire with a big no vote rebellion but I expect enough National voters will be willing to hold their collective noses and vote pragmatically.
In which case Colin Craig will have become John Key’s bitch.
It’s unknown how Craig might negotiate in politics, he claims to have made no attempt to talk to National so far.
Also from Scott Chris, referring to Redbaiter’s Conservative support:
And with the likes of Dirty Harriet, igm, kowtow, imp, D4j and dime also throwing their lot in with the Cons gives you an idea of the calibre of person Craig appeals to.
If you add Manolo to that list you get a collection who think National is a traitor to the right, who are anti-Maori and pro-Christian/anti-atheist. Types who supported the Tea Party and Sarah Palin simply because they thought they would drag politics to the far right in the US.
It is difficult to get any idea of what supporters think the Conservative Party stands for, they just see a glimmer of hope that Craig will be anti what they don’t like.
While Kiwiblog participants won’t represent the whole support base for the Conservatives they are significant in the social media fight for Craig.
If Conservatives make it into Parliament and are in a position to negotiate concessions it’s unknown what they will demand and hold out for. Whatever they might manage it will most likely be a disappointment to the hard righties. Colin Craig may pander to their social frustrations and prejudices but he seems far from right wing on economic policy.
But Craig’s vague policy positions allow the politically disaffected to imagine what he might achieve for them.