Mondayising ANZAC and Waitangi Days a step closer

The Holidays (Full Recognition of Waitangi Day and Anzac Day) Amendment Bill passed its committee stages on a voice vote in Parliament tonight. Labour MP David Clark began by thanking supporters of his bill:

I want to place on record from the outset my thanks to all of those parties in Parliament that are supporting this bill. To my Labour colleagues, the Green Party, New Zealand First, the Māori Party, United Future, Mana, and Brendan Horan, they have all pledged their support for this bill and without it this bill would not pass through the House.

National and Act oppose the bill but are not trying to stop it’s passage. Clark suggested they support the bill…

So I want the National Party to get in behind this bill. I want John Key to get in behind this bill.

…but then lambasted Key…

His suggestion today in Parliament that ordinary Kiwis could not be trusted to front on Anzac Day is a disgrace. It is an outrage.

..which doesn’t look like a genuine attempt to win Key over. As one subsequent National speaker said:

MIKE SABIN (National—Northland): I find it a little ironic that the member resuming his seat, Dr David Clark, is asking for the support of the Prime Minister and then sets about beating him around the head with a frozen fish as to his rationale. It does exemplify what we have seen so often from the Opposition the beatings will continue until morale improves approach to garnering support.

Clark has done this before, being heavily critical of Peter Dunne for not supporting his Minimum Wage bill. He can have a bit of a “you’re with us or against us” attitude.

In a press release David Shearer followed a similar approach, repeating comments he had made during Question Time:

“Almost everyone except John Key and his National MPs support this legislation. Polls show most New Zealanders support it. Businesses support it. The tourism industry supports it. And even John Key once said that it was ‘fair enough’.

But there was scant support shown by Labour MPs yesterday, with only a handful participating – four plus Clark at the beginning of the debate.

MondayBill

Despite the low numbers a good debate followed with some strong speeches from both sides of the house.

National’s main objection was that Mondayising ANZAC day would detract from the commemoration aspect of the day (throughtout the speeches ANZAC Day was frequently mentioned as being the most important aspect of the pros and cons, with Waitangi Day getting far fewer passing mentions).

Sabin closed the debate with further acknowwledgment to Clark (previous speakers had also done this):

I just want to acknowledge David Clark and the work that he has done on this, and although I am new to the Transport and Industrial Relations Committee…

And went on to summarise his and National’s position:

…I also acknowledge the select committee and just reflect on the fine balance that I think is reflected here. I have listened very carefully to the contributions from across the Chamber, and mine, as I spoke to previously, does reflect very much my view that the servicemen, in particular, on Anzac Day tip that balance in favour of voting against this bill. That is certainly where my position comes from, and the reverence and importance of that day in commemoration.

He also pointed out some Labour history:

I just want to reflect on a couple of points from former Labour Party members of Parliament.

One Minister of Māori Affairs, Matiu Rata, said: “Like Anzac Day, New Zealand Day is not to be Mondayised. It is the significance of the occasion that is important, rather than the fact that it be a paid public holiday. It should not be regarded as merely an extra paid holiday.” That was one Matiu Rata who made that comment.

Another former Minister of Internal Affairs, one Hon Mr May, said: “The Government believes that Mondayising of New Zealand Day would distract from the importance of the significance of the event it commemorates.”

Another former MP, Mr Rēweti, said that the committee considered that it was justified in declaring that Waitangi Day should not be Mondayised, because the Labour Party had gone to the electors in 1972 on the policy that Waitangi Day would not be Mondayised.

Those were the heady days of the Labour Party—the working man’s party—that we remember, but I do not necessarily believe that they are represented in the Chamber here today.

Another former MP, one Mr Marshall, said: “I believe that it would greatly detract from the observance of the New Zealand Day for it to be Mondayised and turned into just another long weekend.”

I think it is quite clear that there is a shift in the modern Labour Party, if I could call it that, from the traditional values that were held. I believe that those traditional values that are actually held across the country are something that we should reflect on in this Chamber, and certainly I do in being quite happy to oppose this bill.

But the bill had sufficient support to pass on a voice vote. It will be popular – people like extra holidays, even if it’s just one or two extra days every six or seven years. Clark had promoted popular support in his speech.

It indicates several things: the popularity of this bill, the fact that it is common sense, and that it restores to ordinary Kiwis the 11 public holidays they expect to receive every year.

Actually no, thaty’s an odd claim, it restores nothing. It gives us more than we had.

It has been universally popular since it was made clear that commemorations will still occur on the same days that they always have, that is 6 February for Waitangi Day and 25 April for Anzac Day.

The fact that a holiday follows on the Monday that follows a weekend occurrence of those days is what changes. We have a bill that makes sure that we have those 11 holidays ever year. That gives those holidays the full recognition that other holidays have. 

More than 80 percent of New Zealanders in some polls support this bill. In the only quantitative survey that has been done 87 percent of small and medium sized business owners are either in support or neutral toward this bill.

So the bill proceeds.

I think ANZAC Day will continue to be commemorated appropriately on each 25th of April, regardless if we get an additional day off on Monday occasionally.

But Waitangi Day will simply be a long holiday weekend to most people.

I don’t think anyone will be bothered by the change, it’s a minor tweak to our holidays that we will barely notice.

Video of the speeches begin: Holidays (Full Recognition of Waitangi Day and Anzac Day) Amendment Bill – Committee Stage – Taken as one debate – Part 1

Patriotism in action

Guest column by Martin Gibson, as published in Gisborne Herald, Saturday 28 April.

As I listened to the Last Post echo across the rivers I wondered about the best way to be patriotic these days.

Not some elite-approved token patriotism of watching sport, or boorish jealous hassling of our Australian brothers in arms, but action, effort and sacrifice for the idea of New Zealand, and kinship with those who live here.

What would those East Coast Diggers, sailors and airmen have wanted us to do besides turn up at the Cenotaph on Anzac Day to remember them?

When it comes to asking questions about what the veterans we honour on Anzac Day would want of us, I have an advantage, because my neighbour survived WW2.

When I asked him what he thought was the best way for us to be patriotic, he scratched his head, then said it was probably for people to appreciate freedom by standing up for it, even if it’s someone else’s welfare or freedom.

“It’s so easy for us to live in our own bubbles, watch the telly and just think of ourselves. We need to get out of our bubbles and help each other . . . I reckon that’s pretty patriotic,” he said.

The growing crowds of young people at cenotaphs each Anzac Day suggest a desire to follow the example of those men and women who had courage, sacrifice and selflessness extracted from them by the time of their birth.

We know that, by contrast, our time allows cowardice to go mostly undetected. It favours the greedy and fosters the belief that individuals are more important than the health of society.

In our hearts we know this will never bring the best out of us individually or as a community.

Is it possible to get some of the benefit of wartime without the conflict, futility and waste?

We need to keep sifting the wheat from the chaff in terms of the legacy of war, because war is hell.

Servicemen who returned bristling with the tapu of Tu brought wars back into our homes, where they continue to rage even today, spilling out into our streets in gangs and schools, killing and wounding.

Heavy drinking is handy for someone trying to briefly erase horrible memories, but the behaviour of heroes was followed by generations after.

We do not honour our veterans by ignoring the mental and spiritual illness they brought back and in many cases spread around.

As I walked home from the dawn parade, I passed the council chambers and army hall. I stopped a while and thought about the young men who had once stood there.

I imagined them waiting to sign up, trying to appear brave, hands often calloused from building our houses and shops, clearing bush and building fences in the hills around the East Coast. Some barely out of primary school. Excited by how life was about to veer from dull hard work to meaning, heroism, history, adventure. Away from Gisborne, out of Te Tairawhiti to see the world and be tempered in the fires of war!

Perhaps it is that willingness to serve we should begin to honour, rather than bad luck in the roll of the dice, the drop of the bomb, the sweep of the machine gun, or an unexpected talent for killing.

This way we can also honour those who did not see combat, including the women left to do the work, raise the kids and cope with the loss.

We can look with equanimity at those who refused to go and often suffered worse.

Each year, more and more young people turn up to the cenotaphs, signalling the will to step up and serve also evident in Canterbury’s Student Army after last year’s quakes.

Rather than despairing of our young people, it is time we offered them their own testing missions with meaning.

Whether they are combating hunger, declaring war on pests, defending treeless rivers, rescuing polluted water, here or overseas, they deserve some well-organised, well-resourced heroic missions that may echo down the generations to come.

If we can find the will to act decisively without being forced to act, our great advantage is that we can pick our battles, and these have the potential to leave us with more leaders and heroes, not fewer.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers