Speech for Dave’s mates – slickly sickly

David Shearer has given a speech “on the economy”. I’ve only read some of the transcript, but about all I’ll say is that I mustn’t be the target demographic (I’m not one of Dave’s mates).

It’s slickly sickly, attacking the budget that is not yet announced, and attacking National in advance.

Shearer has a new media manager (I presume by now) – this is the same old but worse than previous speeches, or that’s how it seems. Here are Labour’s highlights.

Budget For John’s Mates Not Your Mates

Wednesday, 8 May 2013, 11:00 am
Press Release: New Zealand Labour Party

Labour Leader David SHEARER

Media Statement/Speech

Budget For John’s Mates Not Your Mates

John Key is spending more time looking after vested interests than the interests of hard-working New Zealanders who aren’t able to get ahead under National, says Labour Leader David Shearer.

“There will be something missing from next week’s Budget – people. You’ll hear lots about glossy business growth agendas and progress reports. But there’ll be nothing in it to help people find decent jobs, buy a house, pay their bills or to stop them moving to Australia.

“This will be a Budget for the boardroom, not the smoko room. It won’t change people’s lives because John Key is more interested in looking after his mates than your mates.

“This Government has made promise after promise in Budget after Budget. But it hasn’t delivered. It has let New Zealanders down.

“It promised 170,000 more jobs. But in the last year there were 30,000 fewer. It promised to help the ‘growing underclass’ but there are now almost 24,000 more people on benefits and 21% of our kids are living in poverty. There are 163,000 New Zealanders who are unemployed. Where is the brighter future?

 “The differences between John Key’s National Government and the Labour Government that I will lead are now crystal clear.

“Labour will put people at the heart of everything it does. National has forgotten the hardworking people who are the backbone of this country.

“Labour is prepared to use the power only a Government has to make a real difference to people’s lives – like bringing down power bills and building affordable homes.

“John Key won’t. He’s too focused on share floats to care about the Kiwis working their guts out to make ends meet.

“Labour has the courage to make the big changes that National is afraid to make – changes that will transform the economy for everyone.

“Labour will create a fairer and more equal society. Under National, income inequality is the highest since records began. 

“As Prime Minister, I want to create and build – not just trade and sell. I will back New Zealanders who are doing their bit so that we can build a country we can all be proud of,” said David Shearer.

As I said, I’m not a target mate of Shearer. Vernon Small posted a picture of Shearer’s mates:

Small: “Shearer talks – to big turnout of young Labour says party. Hmm more grey heads among young than there used to be”

I guess a work/school/Uni day won’t be convenient for a lot of younger people.

There might be some mates commenting  on the speech at The Standard: Shearer’s pre budget speech

This morning David Shearer gave Labour’s “pre budget” speech. No new policy, but plenty of good one-liners and a strong statement of Labour’s position.

No new policy but some good one-liners – not sure that will wow the disaffected and disillusioned ex Labour voters (which I’m one off).

If you are one of Dave’s mates you might like to read his whole speech:

David Shearer’s Speech:

Putting People First

A few weeks ago a woman contacted me asking for help.

She and her partner both have jobs. They pay their bills. They keep up with the mortgage and are raising four children.

But they’re struggling to get by from week to week.

She told me their situation is desperate. Her partner even went to Christchurch to try and earn a bit more.

Just the other week their car needed four new tyres to pass the warrant.

That used up the little savings they had and they had to borrow from a friend.

She said “we feel like bad role models for our children because we are constantly struggling”.

But from what she told me, they’re as good a role model as anyone.

They have my utmost respect.

But it’s not right and it’s not fair that it’s so hard to raise a family here.

She’s been let down and left behind by this Government.

John Key isn’t interested in the problems faced by hardworking families like hers.

He’s too focused on share-floats to care about the Kiwis working their guts out to make ends meet.

He’s more focused on his mates than your mates.

So it’ll be no surprise to you that when Bill English delivers his fifth Budget next week, there will be something missing.

People.

You’ll hear a lot about glossy business growth agendas and progress reports.

But there won’t be anything to help you find a job – or get a better job. To help you buy a house, to help you pay your bills or to stop your family moving to Australia.

Because that is this Government’s record.

This government makes promise after promise in Budget after Budget.

But it hasn’t delivered.

So why would you believe them this year?

Let’s take a look at their scorecard.

John Key promised he’d give Kiwis a reason to stay.

But as of last week, 200,000 people have left for Australia since he came to power.

At the last election, he promised 170,000 jobs. But in the last year there were 30,000 fewer.

There are now more than 163,000 New Zealanders unemployed.

In Budget 2010, they promised higher incomes. But since John Key’s been in office rising prices have outstripped pay packets.

In 2007, he promised to help our “growing underclass”. But income inequality in New Zealand is now the highest since records began.

There are now almost 24,000 more people on benefits and 21% of our kids live in poverty.

Under his watch, the gap between the top 10% and the rest of New Zealand is widening faster.

He promised to close the wage gap with Australia too, but New Zealanders are now earning an average of $58 a week less than their neighbours across the Tasman.

In the 2010 Budget, he promised a step-change in the economy. Instead, he has delivered a step-back for many.

John Key once said he was ambitious for New Zealand. I haven’t heard that for a while. The only thing he’s ambitious about now is his excuses.

You’ll have heard yesterday that he’s certainly not ambitious for Wellington – in fact he’s already signed its death warrant.

Talk about absolutely negatively John Key!

This Budget won’t change your life.

It’s a Budget for the boardroom, not the smoko room.

This National Government spends more time looking after vested interests than your interests.

It’s too busy doing back-room deals with gambling houses and movie giants to make sure hard-working New Zealanders have the wages they need to live on.

Too busy protecting the super-profits of power companies to worry about bringing your power bills down.

Too busy selling our assets to find innovative ways to grow our economy.

So who is this Government working for?

Investment bankers, casino operators, property speculators.

And, if you’re lucky enough to be a director of a power company, you’ll have just got a 73% pay increase on top of a $1200 a day special expenses allowance.

But not you and your family.

Times have been tough. We know that. But our main trading partners have turned the corner. Why haven’t we?

The reason is that this Government has got its priorities wrong.

I believe New Zealand can do better.

But we need to change.

We can’t continue as we are, stagnating and sliding down the global rankings.

We need to change New Zealand for the better.

So that it works in the interests of all people.

My vision for New Zealand is a place where people know they can get ahead, a place where the world wants to live and a place we can all be proud of.

A place that rewards talent and hard work, that puts a premium on innovation.

We’ve got to be forward looking. And find ways to create a country of drive and opportunity.

That’s why I will lead a government focused on what works for you and your family.

A government that’s prepared to change things that aren’t working.

I believe in New Zealand.

But we must do better. And we can.

By unlocking opportunities for everyone through better education.

By creating a stronger economy built on skills, creativity, science, hard graft and our natural advantages.

By building a strong, export-led economy.

I say, if you’re doing your bit, we should do ours as a government for the people.

Because you should be rewarded for your talent and hard work – not because you’re someone’s mate.

That’s the guts of the difference between John Key and me.

My Government will put people at the heart of everything we do.

National has forgotten the people who are the backbone of this country.

I recently met the Nobel Prize winning economist, Joseph Stiglitz, in New York.

He has shown that growing inequality is the number one factor holding countries like New Zealand back.

New Zealand was once one of the most equal societies in the world.  And we were proud of that.

But that’s no longer the case.

Now the gap between the top 10% and the rest is widening faster here than in most other Western countries.

National’s tax switch in 2010 made it worse, with the top 10% of earners taking home 40% of the money.

That’s a bonus of $2.25 billion in their pockets.

That flies in the face of what we know – that an equal society is a fairer society.

But just as importantly, closing that gap helps everyone get ahead – and stay ahead.

Because as Stiglitz shows, inequality is bad for business.

My mechanic earns a decent income but he hasn’t been able to give himself a pay rise for the past four or five years.

He’s being squeezed like many other hard-working New Zealanders.

If people like him have nothing left at the end of the week, they have nothing to spend, nothing to invest and nothing to save.

That’s not good for workers, businesses or our economy as a whole.

We need to change. We need to shift to an economy that works for us all.

As Prime Minister, I want to create and build – not just trade and sell.

I want to an economy that grows businesses and creates high-value jobs that keep our talented people here.

It’s time for new, bold ideas that improve lives without pushing the country further into debt.

It’s time for a Government that’s smart, hands on and uses the power it has to make a difference.

We will be prudent, responsible managers of the country’s finances. We will balance our budgets.

I grew up in a Presbyterian household where we didn’t put things on tick. You saved up and lived within your means.

I understand how important that is.

Labour understands that.

The last Labour Government produced Budget surpluses nine years in a row. It left us with amongst the lowest government debt in the world.

When this Government took over, the books were in surplus. Since then every year, year after year, the Government has been in deficit.

This year we will be almost $8 billion dollars short. That means our Government debt today is $58 billion dollars.

As a country, we must live within our means. We can’t go on spending what we don’t have.

That’s why we need a smart, active government to make changes that will benefit people and boost the economy.

That’s what the next Labour Government will do.

Let me take two examples.

NZ Power. It’s a plan that will reduce household power bills by between $230 and $330 a year and limit future power increases.

That makes a big difference because power prices have gone through the roof in New Zealand. You’re being ripped off.

One woman wrote to me this week to say she and her husband have just had their first child.

She wants to do the best by her new family.

But she feels “physically sick” with worry each time she checks the mailbox for her power bill.

As she says: “Parents in NZ shouldn’t feel worried about the basic necessities for their children such as electricity. It makes you feel hopeless.”

NZ Power will change that. It’ll put money back into the hands of people struggling to make ends meet.

And that’s good for the economy too.

Cutting power bills will put cash into the pockets of Kiwis and businesses. Money they will spend and invest.

Independent economists Berl say that extra spending will stimulate our economy, boost GDP by about $450 million and create at least 5,000 jobs.

John Key says power prices aren’t too high. No wonder he’s not prepared to act.

He’s out of touch and not listening to Kiwis.

He’s listening to the power companies and the share-brokers who are protecting their patch.

I say to them: you can choose to buy shares. You can’t choose to buy power.

You should earn a fair return, but not a super profit.

It’s that simple.

So if those big vested interests want to stop consumers getting a better deal and stop our economy getting a boost, well then bring it on.

Because I’m not about to sit around and let that happen.

Let me give you another example.

KiwiBuild

House prices are rocketing up and the rate of home ownership is sliding.

That’s why we’ve come up with an innovative way to help 100,000 Kiwi families into affordable homes.

It means building houses – bricks and mortar – not fiddling with the RMA or pushing the blame onto councils.

Operating on such a scale means our construction companies can make huge savings. And over time the programme funds itself.

And again, it’s good for our economy and creates thousands of jobs and apprenticeships.

It’s another example of how my Government will be smart and hands-on.

Labour policies will help all New Zealanders, not just the rich and well connected.

Our policies are practical and they put people first.

We need to create opportunities because that’s the only way to tackle inequality.

We’ll start with giving our kids a world-class education. We’ll extend reading recovery and put food in schools so children are ready and able to learn.

We’ll help them discover what they want to do with their lives and make sure they know how to get there.

We’ll make sure people get a decent wage – lift the minimum wage to $15 an hour.

We’ll champion a living wage so that people can provide for their family.

Our future is a high-wage economy not a low wage one.

Right across the economy we will make fundamental changes that will transform the economy to grow export businesses and create high wage jobs.

Monetary policy will change.

We’ll broaden the objectives of the Reserve Bank to wider than just inflation because the high dollar is killing our exporters.

The research and development policy will change.

Because R&D tax credits will help our smart businesses grow and sell their products to the world.

The tax system will change.

We want to shift investment from speculation on housing to our productive businesses. That’s why we’ll introduce a capital gains tax.

The savings policy will change.

We will enrol everyone into KiwiSaver to secure Kiwis’ future retirement and build an investment pool to power our businesses.

We’ll give Kiwi companies the first crack at big Government contracts. But in return, we’ll expect those companies to hire trainees.

And we’ll pay employers the equivalent of the dole to take on an unemployed person as an apprentice.

And there’s more to come.

We have the courage to make the big changes this Government is afraid to make.

Changes that will transform the economy for everyone.

We have two very different paths before us.

One path – under National leads to disappointment, decline and constant struggle where Kiwis fall behind the rest of the world.

Led by a Government that’s consumed by scandal, broken promises and one that sides with its own mates and vested interests.

Or a Labour Government that puts you first.

That has the courage to make the big changes to improve your life.

That will back New Zealanders who are doing their bit.

My first Budget will be about hope.

It will be about giving hardworking families a reason to believe things will get better.

It will give young Kiwis opportunities and a reason to stay.

It will give families a decent life where their kids can reach their full potential.

It will give businesses the backing they need to flourish.

People are my priority.

At the end of the day, it comes down to a simple question – who do you have faith in?

I put my faith in New Zealanders.

In their ‘can do’ attitude, gutsy approach to life and willingness to do the hard graft.

As Prime Minister, I’ll back you.

I will make the change to a prosperous society.

A fairer society.

And a country that we can all be proud of.

Shane Jones “swallowing dead rats”

Shane Jones looked like he was uncomfortably swallowing dead rats when he was interviewed on Q + A yesterday.

Labour continue to pass the parcel (or hot potato) in their promotion of their “big Kahuna” power policy.

  • David Shearer did a joint launch with Russel Norman.
  • David Parker was interviewed on The Nation a week ago.
  • Grant Robertson had interviews and issued press releases through the week (Shearer was out of the country).
  • It was Shane Jones’ turn to front up on Sunday’s Q + A.

Jessica Mutch asked Jones if he thought Shearer’s joint press conference with Norman launching similar-ish power policies was a good idea.

JESSICA Do you or do you not think it was a good idea?

SHANE Yeah, no, no, the fact that the Greens and Labour sat together and talked about moderating power prices for the benefit of industry and the households is good optics.

JESSICA Steven Joyce put out a press release last night saying that the Greens are having a lot of influence and saying “more middle-of-road MPs like Shane Jones are now isolated and forced to recite the anti-growth agenda”. What’s your response to that?

SHANE No, well, anyone who’s got a sliver of knowledge about me knows that I’m a firm believer in growth. There will be occasions where we continue to have a different position with the Greens, but, look, Steven Joyce-

JESSICA But does Steven Joyce have a point?

SHANE He’s just being hysterical. It’s pretty sad that he’s having to recite my name at a National Party-

JESSICA So you’re not having to swallow dead rats here?

SHANE No, it’s not how politics works. You have your say. You may be a bit frustrated, etc. I mean, I’m a Maori politician. I live with frustration. And then once having arrived at a position, then you go out, you robustly sell it, and then you convince the public that this is good for the economy, this is good for households and the people who are against it are tainted because they’re paid by the government to oppose our policy.

JESSICA So what you’re basically saying is you have to suck it up and go out and sell Labour’s policy.

SHANE Without a doubt. You don’t-

JESSICA Even if you don’t believe in it?

SHANE No, no, no, no, no. What you do is you have your debate and you’ll never ever completely agree with everything behind the scenes, but you show loyalty, and unless the voters believe that you’re a united team, then why would they ever support you?

Labour have tried to look united with Greens to promote a credible  image of Government-in-waiting, but they don’t even look united amongst themselves.

Jones waffled around the topic but looked far from convincing. Neither Shearer nor Parker had looked comfortable when it was their turn.

The Labour “team” has looked like a procession of reluctant individuals – are they all swallowing dead rats in climbing on board the Green machine?

Video – Shane Jones on Labour’s power plan (10:06)

Full Transcript – Q+A: Transcript of Shane Jones interview

 

 

Labouring with political vapidity

Labour have a serious communication problem. Their obsession with repetitive media managed messages delivered by bland bodgies threatens their existence as a political power.

Their vapid messengers have become as appealing as a flat beer. Labour’s fizz has all but evaporated.

Gareth Hughes’ “Hey Clint” moment did more then reveal how much some MPs reply on their media managers, it reinforced the impression that much of what many MPs say is vapid party parroting. Hughes stumbled and fumbled when he forgot his carefully practised lines.

Grant Robertson is leading Labour’s defence of it’s NZ Power policy. He has posted this at Red Alert:

Power to the People

Posted by  on April 26th, 2013

If you wanted a reason to know why we need to do something about power prices, look no further than the lead story in today’s Dominion Post. 44% of people in the survey are living pay day to pay day. The cost of living is taking its toll as unemployment stays high and wages are not keeping pace. Raewyn Fox from the Family Budgeting Services Federation said they had seen a 60% increase in those needing financial support and advice in the last two years. And yes, she highlighted power prices as one of the causes of financial stress.

One of the reasons I am really proud of New Zealand Power as a policy is that it will put money back into the pockets of ordinary New Zealanders.  It is a hugely significant change to the way our electricity system is run. Its not something that we have gone into lightly, but New Zealanders have been ripped off for too long. Its time that people come first, not super-profits and million dollar CE salaries. This policy cuts to the heart of reducing inequality and it will help businesses who struggle with energy costs to develop and create more jobs.

This is what we mean by Labour being a hands-on government.  We can use the power of being in government to change our country for the better.  And yes, you can expect to see more bold policy from Labour. Just like KiwiBuild and NZ Power we are not going to sit on our hands while opportunity and prosperity concentrates in the hands of the few. National’s disastrous policies in education, labour relations and elsewhere need to be, and will be, turned around. And we are not going to be put off by the predictable howls of outrage from those with a vested interest.

The government Labour leads will be a progressive, social democratic government, far, far different from the hands-off crony capitalism of the National Party. Get on board if you want to be part of it!

Chris Trotter has linked Robertson to the Hughes humbug with a “Hey Julian” post.

Robertson’s post is full of carefully crafted claptrap, a collection of tediously repeated phrases. And he closes with a corny attempt at party recruitment.

Vapid party parroting is an ongoing problem for Labour. They haven’t learnt from their last term mistakes, where Phil Goff droned repeatedly on his way to an election disaster, and Labour failed to rebuild.

The public instinctively recognise a party drone from the first few syllables and more often than not they turn off. But not all politicians.

Like him or not John Key sounds like he is speaking his own words, warts and all.

Bill English sounds like he’s drawling his own mind. Stephen Joyce, Judith Collins, Gerry Brownlee, Tony Ryall, Paula Bennett – there can be plenty to criticise, but they all sound like they are distinct thinking people, not puppets strangled by a media manager’s strings.

Hekia Parata’s communication disasters last year stood out because of the contrast with her colleagues.

National’s Maurice Williamson and Chris Auchinvole were stars of the marriage debates. They were clearly speaking their own thoughts.

Labour MPs can do it – Louisa Wall expressed her own personality and convictions strongly.

I remember rookie David Clark giving an excellent marriage speech too – which stood out because Clark is more often a loyal party parrot. I campaigned alongside him in the last election and most of his speeches were repetitive party lines 0- very repetitive.

Goff uninspired throughout his term as Labour leader, and his party failed to rebuild – they lost support.

David Shearer is famous for his fumbling mumbling lines – he is improving, but that’s simply because he is learning more parrot lines, we still have no idea what he stands for or what he might think himself.

Last week on The Nation Labour’s finance spokesperson David Parker gave an inauthentic recital – see Story | Video | Transcript.

And the mid-man of Labour’s top three, Robertson, shows with this post he is another vapid party parrot.

What does Robertson (or Shearer or Labour) really think, believe in, get inspired by? I have no idea.

If they want a real chance of inspiring the many disillusioned voters they have to start to sound like real people with minds and passions of their own, something sadly lacking amongst Labour lackeys.

Media managed muppets are symptoms of a mindless MP malaise – politicians and parties without passion, without a soul. Without leadership, without inspiration.

Labouring with political vapidity.

If they don’t recognise this and address it, Labour will continue their cringey crawl into personality, policy and party vapidity.

vap·id (v p d, v p d). adj. 1. Lacking liveliness, animation, or interest; dull: vapid conversation. 2. Lacking taste, zest, or flavor; flat: vapid beer.

Labouring with political vapidity

Green power bid pushes lamentable Labour

Now that Labour’s NZ Power pushing is turning to custard attention is turning to how they got into this hapless situation, facing a crisis of confidence while their leader David Shearer is out of the country.

And the claims are growing that the Greens forced Labour’s hand and rushed them in to launching their poorly thought through power policy.

A Chris Trotter post lamenting Grant Robertson’s capitulation to market realities also suggests that Labour were pushed by the Greens.

Grant’s willingness to rule out any further anti-market forays by Labour shows how peripheral Energising New Zealand always was to the key power-brokers within Labour’s caucus. According to the National Business Review, the party’s self-denying ordinance had been tucked away in the detail of Labour’s policy announcement from Day One.

David Shearer’s refusal to postpone his trip to London so that he could be on the spot to defend Energising New Zealand is now explained. The policy wasn’t his initiative, he had no personal stake in its success or failure, and he was happy to leave the explanations to the actual man-with-the-plan, Labour’s Finance Spokesperson, David Parker.

Parker, himself, would probably have preferred to wait, but the imminent release of the Greens’ almost identical energy policy forced Labour’s hand. Rather than see their Green rivals steal yet another march on them, Labour’s strategists acquiesced to a joint announcement.

‘MARC’ adds to this:

Well, I thought all along that it was really the Greens setting the pace and leading the agenda on the electricity regulation policies. Having seen the announcement by Norman and Shearer on the TV news it was so clear, that it was Norman, who pushed for this to be announced. I saw Shearer stand there, turn left and right, glance over to Norman, and otherwise display a composure that betrayed a degree of half halfheartedness.

Yes, Labour were forced to join with the Greens, so they would not lose face yet again, standing there with the undies down below their knees, while the Greens were announcing another, somehow smart-sounding, new policy.

This fits with David Shearer’s late Sunday night press release, his waiting until the BERL report on Tuesday and then standing between Russel Norman and David Parker on Thursday at the big announcement.

It’s been a mess for Labour, and it may keep getting worse.

And it’s interesting in the context of Shearer claiming that Labour wouldn’t dance in time to National’s agenda – he said…

“We are working…according to our own timetable.”

But it’s now being claimed they were dancing to a Green tune.

And it goes some way to explaining the Labour muckiness:

  • Shearer looking like and sounding like moulded cheese in the Norman and Parker sandwich
  • Parker on The Nation looking like he didn’t own the policy nor conviction that it was sensible
  • Robertson pushing the party lines for a while, then switching to damage control

So what about Greens? Since the joint announcement it was suspected that it was Green policy that Labour had belatedly tacked a few of their own bits onto.

If the timing was dicated by the Greens that put’s more responsibility on the Greens for the MRP share float sabotage claims. Gareth Hughes failed to contain his elation at the news that the MRP had been (temporarily) suspended – see Clint too.

If this was all planned by the Greens why would they time an announcment for after the start of the share float, just before Russel Norman was due to go on two weeks leave overseas?

That probably wasn’t the original intent. It’s likely the Greens wanted to make their Empowering the people announcement prior to the share float, but when Labour got involved at the last minute they had to delay.

That led to the Greens having to rely on Gareth Hughes to fly the Green flag. That resulted in embarrassment with the Clint incident.

What now for the Greens? Will they just keep congratulating themselves on losing the country money – Mighty River Power $100m down under proposal – and wait for Russel to return from holiday?

But maybe the Greens should be worrying – worrying about their already dubious financial credibility taking a hit.

Worrying about how to present their MPs as credible independent thinkers and not just puppets in a media machine.

And worrying that their sole hope of being a part of Government, the Labour Party, looks more and more like a lamentable leaderless lost cause.

http://yournz.org/2013/04/23/clint-too/

Labour spooked, supporters spitting

When Labour launched their NZ Power policy last week they were focussed on promoting prepared PR – the “fairness” of lower power prices for “hard working New Zealanders” and “real businesses”.

They seemed oblivious to the possible effects of their announcement on the financial markets, as this twitter exchange suggests:

H du Plessis-Allan@hdpaNEWS 18 Apr
Contact’s share price is down 3% after Labour/ Greens announced power regulation plans. If it affects MRP similarly, it’s less $ for us all.

Grant Robertson@grantrobertson1
@hdpaNEWS
its actually lower power prices for us all, which is more money in your pocket, which gets spent elsewhere in the economy.

Or they were diverting and denying. They appeared to be playing politics and ignoring warnings. On Sunday Grant Robertson again:

Grant Robertson ‏@grantrobertson1 20 Apr
@stevenljoyce this policy really has you spooked doesn’t it Steven. lol

But three days later, after a number of financial experts had severely questioned the possible effects and threatened the credibility of Labour’s policy, it looks like they are the ones who are spooked.

Grant Robertson is fronting the damage control because David Shearer left on an overseas tour just after the policy announcement.

Labour won’t intervene in any other market, says Roberston

Labour Party deputy leader Grant Robertson has moved to try and reassure financial markets that its sudden lurch to favour central planning in the electricity industry is one-off.

In a statement attacking Economic Development Minister Steven Joyce, Robertson says: “Labour makes no apology for stepping in to fix problems in the electricity sector. But this is not a signal that Labour is going to intervene elsewhere in the economy.

“As we said on the day we launched NZ Power, we have no plans to intervene in any other markets.”

That point was buried in the detail of last week’s announcements by the Labour and Green parties.

And it was either deliberately or negligently ignored by Labour in their promotion of their policy, until nearly a week after the policy announcement.

But the damage due perceptions of Labour’s economic recklessness has been done. The all important centre of the voting spectrum have had their initial suspicions confirmed – Labour have acted like financial misfits.

And it gets worse for Labour. While trying to limit damage to the centre they have riled the left. Activists lauded the lurch towards socialism when NZ Power was announced. For the first time since Shearer became leader

Chris Trotter has posted in response to Robertson with  “Hey, Julian! – We Are NOT Pleased!” Grant Robertson Calls Off Labour’s Assault On Neoliberalism at The Daily Blog.

WELL, THAT DIDN’T TAKE LONG, did it? Exactly one week after jolting thousands of New Zealanders into reconsidering a vote for Labour, Grant Robertson, the acting Leader of the Opposition, issued the above statement – unforgivably surrendering all the gains his party had made.

That Grant Robertson turned out to be the author of this despicable document surprises me not at all.

With a little help from his spin-doctor, Julian Robbins, Labour’s Deputy-Leader composed and issued a media release that effectively runs up the white flag on Labour’s all-too-brief foray into heady world of radical policy-making.

I say ‘white flag’ because Grant’s statement is not just a deferential promise not to play the wicked socialist larrikin in any more of New Zealand’s industrial sectors, but a sotto voce reassurance that even Labour’s energy policy is unlikely to survive the process of lifting certain key Labour bottoms from the Opposition to the Treasury benches.

High power prices aren’t the only thing hurting New Zealand families, Grant. By ruling out intervention “elsewhere in the economy”, you have betrayed not only your party and its supporters, but the electoral victory which, thanks to the political energy unleashed by Energising New Zealand, had been yours for the taking.

Trotter was initially ecstatic about Labour’s NZ Power policy, and flip flopped with his change of heart about David Shearer (see Okay! Okay! I surrender. Shearer Stays).

Now Trotter is flipping his lid. And so are others, as the first comment on his post demonstrates:

Utterly Disillusioned says:

OH Effing soding unprintable reaction! Just when I had vague hopes that the pseudo-left MIGHT have got its head out of its butt they manage to screw themselves, AND so many of their supporters, over.

Didn’t the utterly hysterical rightist reaction show these people ANYTHING! Such a reaction indicates decent policy. Guess what? Joyce and Key were rattled. Thus….DO MORE OF IT! BUT NO! Lets NOT! SOB!

Clearly they either secretly don’t want to be the government or are actually too politically inept and stupid to be granted the privilege.

Most of the rest of the comments there express dismay, disdain and despair.

It wasn’t surprising that Labour’s NZ Power announcement resulted in anger from the right and scathing criticism from much of the financial sector.

There was suspicion about motives and scepticism about policy from the centre.

Initially the left applauded – or some of the left, there was also some caution from the centre left:

Giovanni says:

The thought that maybe you were a bit hasty in lauding the policy had crossed some minds. ;-)

And now the left of the left are spitting.

NZ Power showed signs of being doomed to being a debacle from the moment Shearer announced they would be announcing a grand power plan. Labour now face serious damage control, and their leader is missing in action – see Where’s Norman and Shearer?

Grant Robertson has recently raised doubts about his “leader-in-waiting” credentials. He is now left handling what looks like a lemon, and even Labour’s core supporters have gone sour.

Robertson’s mettle will be tested. This will take much more management than muttering media mumbo jumbo.

But his first tweet today isn’t encouraging:

Grant Robertson@grantrobertson1 

More evidence that cost of living is causing major problems. Time to lower power prices

La-la-la-la-la won’t cut it Grant. You have to rise to the occasion or you will be roasted.

Where’s Norman and Shearer?

A week ago David Shearer and Russel Norman announced a policy on power that was promoted as a game changer in both  the electricity industry and in next year’s election stakes.

Shearer referred to Labour’s NZ Power policy as “the big Kahuna”. He also said that timing his announcement with the MRP float was coincidental, and he has said several times “We are working…according to our own timetable.”

You would think the timing would reflect the supposed importance of the policy to Greens and Labour. How did Shearer and Norman promote their big new policy from there?

They had David Parker and Gareth Hughes front up for interviews about it on The Nation on Saturday. Parker and Hughes, and Grant Robertson, have since been interviewed on it.

In the meantime the party leaders have been conspicuous in their absence from promoting their great new policy.

David Shearer left for England on Monday. He is on a world tour which will also take him to New York and the UN.

It was announced on Russel Norman’s Facebook on Monday:

Russel is on leave from now until Monday 6 May. I (Izzy, Russel’s Executive Assistant) will be checking his messages and posting the occasional update, but Russel’s profile won’t be as active as usual for the next couple of weeks. Cheers, and happy recess!
-Izzy

Izzy has shared a few political posts on Facebook for Norman. Norman has posted once, apparently on holiday in Los Angeles.

Norman and Shearer chose a time to announce their power policies knowing that they would both soon be leaving the country.

In the meantime Gareth Hughes has botched an interview on Green media management and Green glee at sabotaging the MRP float.

And Grant Robertson is trying to repair the damage Labour has inflicted on itself by spooking and threatening the financial markets due to Labour’s lack of thought about the likely wider effects of their proposed socialisation of the power market.

And the Labour and Green party leaders have other things to do overseas.

The timing of the NZ Power policy has turned out to be terrible as far as ongoing party promotion and damage control is concerned.

This adds weight to the probability that the timing of the announcement last week was for one purpose, to try and upset the MRP float – something neither Labour nor Greens have credibly denied, they have avoided answering questions about this honestly, and Hughes inadvertently made it obvious what they wanted their announcement to do, inflict damage on National’s asset sale programme.

And Greens and Labour will be left floundering without their leaders.

Shearer’s power policy timing defence

In trying to defend Labour’s timing of their NZ Power announcement David Shearer just adds confusion. One News have reported in Shearer defends power policy timing:

Labour leader David Shearer says the reason he released his new energy policy at the same time Mighty River Power shares went on sale is because he thought the Maori Council appeal would take much longer.

Shearer says he intended to announce Labour’s power reforms policy after this year’s budget was announced but brought it forward when the shares were floated.

But Maori Council water appeal dismissed – that was on February 27th, nearly two months ago. Why would the Maori Council appeal have affected this sort of policy decision?

Is Shearer admitting that if the Maori Council had held up the share float then Labour would not have developed and released this policy? If that’s the case it adds weight to the argument that Labour’s main intent has been to stop the share float – the deliberate sabotage theory.

When Rachel Smalley asked David Parker on The Nation “How long have you been working on this policy? This specific policy?” he responded:

This specific system pushing it forward to this, the last month.

(See Labour and Greens on “coincidental” power policies and timings.)

The Government began taking registrations of interest from the public in Mighty River Power shares on 5 March 2013.

So the share float was well signalled. The Financial Markets Authority approved the sale of Mighty River Power on 12 April, with the share offer scheduled to open on 15 April.

Shearer seems to have rushed, first announcing his intent late last Sunday night, just prior to the share offer opening. On Monday he fobbed off any schedule for providing deal. On Tuesday he said he would be announcing later in the week. He then made his policy announcement alongside Russel Norman on Thursday.

Rush job on the big Kahuna

When announcing Labour’s power policy Shearer referred to it as “the big Kahuna”. Labour seems to think this is (at last) the game changer they have been looking for since the 2008 election loss.

Rush jobs raise risks – and it’s showing. Labour’s power messages are confused, cack handed and lacking conviction.

Unfortunately that probably sums up Labour over the last couple of years.

 

Labour’s financial deficit

The economy will be a major factor in the next election (it could easily be the deciding factor). Labour’s financial credibility and their ability to promote themselves as competent managers of the New Zealand economy will be under close scrutiny.

Labour’s release of their NZ Power policy has highlighted some potential problems for Labour – they appear to have a significant financial deficit (and a communication deficit).

At the NZ Power policy launch David Shearer claimed it was “the big kahuna”. A two or three hundred dollar a year election bribe is not big, especially when you consider the potential down sides.

After the launch Shearer seemed to disappear, and has now gone on an overseas tour. This may not be a bad thing for Labour, his financial nous and his ability to express himself are well known deficits.

David Parker was interviewed about NZ Power on The Nation on Saturday. He is a policy wonk and a political wonk, and not a great communicator. It didn’t help that he looked uncomfortable trying to support aspects of the policy. Since then Parker also seems to have retreated from view.

Grant Robertson and Clayton Cosgrove have climbed in to the PR campaign. Neither present a strong voice on financial policy, and their politicking doesn’t

The financial credentials in the current and previous governments are strong.

Labour under Helen Clark had a strong contribution from her deputy and Minister of Finance, Michael Cullen, who was an integral part of a formidable team while calling the financial shots.

National has a Prime Minister with a financial background, and his deputy Bill English also has significant financial credentials.

In contrast Labour has:

  • Leader David Shearer with little known financial or business background.
  • Deputy Grant Robertson with little known financial or business background.
  • No 3 is Labour’s finance spokesperson David Parker – he seems to be far from a dominating force in Labour’s decision making team.
  • Labour’s biggest financial mind and arguably their best speaker, David Cunliffe, has been back benched.

Comparatively Labour has a very weak financial look, and it shows in their fragmented promotion of their “big kahuna”.

To be brutal, it’s not just in finance that Labour looks wish washy weak, it’s hard to see what they stand strongly for.

Labour seem to think NZ Power will be a game changer, but I don’t know if it is big enough or will be strongly enough supported by voters. Labour will still have to look like they know enough about financial matters to run the country.

Currently Labour have a significant financial credibility deficit.

Labour and Greens on “coincidental” power policies and timings

Where there three remarkable coincidences of Labour and Greens:

  • working on very similar power pricing policy independently of each other,
  • they were both planning to announce their policy at about the same time, and
  • the timing had nothing to do with the Mighty River Power share float?

Or are Labour’s David Parker and Green’s Gareth Hughes not being truthful?

They were both interviewed on The Nation yesterday and were both asked about the coincidence of Labour and Greens working on similar power pricing policy.

Rachel Smalley interviewing David Parker…

Rachel: How long have you been working on this policy?

David: Me personally off and on over the years I’ve been working on this since 2006, 2007 to be honest.

Rachel: This specific policy?

David: Well the options that we have to improve our electricity system yes.  This specific system pushing it forward to this the last month.

Rachel: Pretty much a month.  Was it a Greens’ policy that Labour jumped on?

David:  No, it’s an absolute coincidence that we put out a press release last week saying we were announcing this week.  They then phoned us and said they had a plan for this week.  We got together and we found our plans were very similar.

Rachel: You weren’t comfortable appearing with the Greens though alongside us here on the programme?

David: We didn’t want it to be thought that this is Greens’ policy.  This is actually independent Labour policy.  The Greens I think have a similar view in respect of theirs, they’ve arrived at a similar conclusion independently of us.

Rachel Smalley interviewing Gareth Hughes:

Rachel: So let’s talk about this new power policy and what you’re going to be doing with the electricity market, whose policy was this.  Who thought of it first this joint plan if you like?

Gareth: Well we’ve been working on it independently.  We started talking to Labour after their press release on Sunday, realised we had very similar proposals, so we decided to work together on launching them together.  I think it shows the solutions we’re both proposing are commonsense, they’re smart, they’re going to be effective, we both independently reached them.

Well I’ve been thinking about how do we make a fairer more affordable electricity system for some while.  We have been working on this mostly this year.  

The conclusions we’ve both reached independently are broadly similar. 

Putting these two responses together we have:

  • Hughes has been “been working on this mostly this year”.
  • Parker claims “this specific system pushing it forward to this the last month”.
  • Labour “put out a press release last week saying we were announcing this week”.
  • Hughes: “We started talking to Labour after their press release on Sunday”.
  • Parker “Greens phoned us and said they had a plan for this week”.
  • Parker “We got together and we found our plans were very similar”.
  • Hughes “realised we had very similar proposals, so we decided to work together on launching them together”.
  • Parker “it’s an absolute coincidence “.

And there’s a third coincidence.

Rachel: Okay, your timing is at best coincidental.  At worst it’s pretty cynical it has to be said.  You’re toying with Mighty River Power here, it’s an asset that’s valued at around one and a half billion dollars.

Gareth: It is coincidental.

Smalley asked Parker:

Rachel: Is this a genuine economic policy Mr Parker or is this a stunt to derail asset sales?

Parker avoiding answering that, and Hughes claimed MRP float timing “is coincidental”, but that’s at odds with both of their leaders.

Norman was interviewed on Firstline on Friday:

The timing of the policy announcement has been questioned, coming four days into the three-week sale of Mighty River Power shares. Dr Norman says they chose to release the details now, rather than later, so Kiwis considering buying in know what the future might bring.

“We think it’s important that people know, so if you’re thinking about buying Mighty River Power shares it’s only fair enough you know.”

David Shearer said…

…it was not an attempt to derail the Government’s Mighty River share offer which began this week or the wider asset sales plan.

But…

He said it was likely to have an impact on share prices so he had written to the board of Mighty River Power, 49 per cent of which is about to be floated on the stock exchange by the Government, and to shareholding ministers asking them to issue a supplementary disclosure.

“This will allow Kiwis who have applied for shares since Monday to reconsider”

That’s contradictory.

Should we believe the similarity in policies, both parties independently planning an announcement at the same time, and the timing of the announcements in relation to the Mighty River Power share float, were all “an absolute coincidence”?

Source The Nation:

Labour confused on power policy

Labour Leader David Shearer and Finance Spokesman David Parker still appear to differ on whether power generator SOEs will pay a dividend under the party’s new electricity policy.Mr Shearer issued a media statement yesterday saying the party would forgo dividends.But today,…

Greens deny political games

Green Party energy spokesperson Gareth Hughes echoed David Parker’s statement by denying the two parties co-ordinated their announcement as a political…

The Nation clarifies NZ Power play – it was dirty

There were some excellent interviews on The Nation this morning, making it clearer that Labour and Greens have colluded in rushing a hit job on the Mighty River Power share float.

Rachel Smalley interviewed David Parker, Gareth Hughes, Winston Peters and Max Bradford with a focus on the Labour-Green power policy announcement.

Parker squirmed his way out of some obviously uncomfortable questions.

Hughes smugly avoided most of his questions by diverting with ideological policy recitals.

Winston was Winston – notably he effectively categorically ruled out a coalition with National saying the buying back of Mighty River Power shares were a bottom line, which National couldn’t agree to.

What stood out as not credible:

  • The claim that Labour and Greens were independently working on much the same policies and suddenly found this out after Shearer’s press release last Sunday night is obvious nonsense. Parker was particularly uncomfortable trying to explain how long he had been working on the policy, he eventually admitted it had been for about a month, which confirms the obvious, it was a rush job.
  • That there was no intention to sabotage the Mighty River Power float. Both Parker and Hughes made no credible denial.

A fairly clear picture emerged despite the attempts at avoiding giving honest answers.

  1. The policy is obviously Green initiated.
  2. Labour picked up the core of this policy, that Government sitting between power generators and retailers as a single buyer and price controller (despite David Carter investigating this and speaking against it when part of the helen Clark government.
  3. David Shearer put out a hurried press release on Sunday night signalling an announcement to follow, the timing almost certainly so he could claim to have warned that Labour intended doing something that might affect the MRP float before it opened the following day.
  4. On Monday Shearer was very vague about when details would be announced, they were probably still waiting on the BERL report they had requested to back up their policy.
  5. On Tuesday it was announced that the announcement would be made on Thursday, indicating that they were making up the schedule as they rushed through their internal processes.
    UPDATE: The BERL report is dated Tuesday 16th.
  6. The joint Labour-Green (Shearer-Parker-Norman) announcement was made on Thursday.
  7. The parties actually announced separate policies with one major point in common, the single purchaser model.
  8. Despite Shearer promoting it as “the big Kahuna” there are obvious differences and Greens have at least been honest describing theirs as a discussion document rather than a fixed policy. There is still much to be worked out.
  9. Shearer said he had written to Might River Power asking them to update their float warnings with the hurried and belated Labour-Green spiking.

This makes it all look like a rush job orchestrated to impact on the Mighty River Power float, with the aim of sabotaging it as much as possible.

Labour and Greens seem intent on trying (and happy to try) and substantially reduce the amount the Government gets for the float as they feel that a failed Mixed Model will help them politically. They appear not to care about the direct costs, nor the potential collateral damage, which could be substantial.

This is politics at it’s self interested worst.

I’m slightly surprised that Labour would stoop to this level. Power at any cost seems to have overwhelmed their care for the interests of the country.

I’m very surprised that Greens climbed on board Labour’s hit job, they usually pride themselves on being a very principled party, this shows them up as no better than the worst.

If you missed The Nation it will be replayed at 8 am tomorrow and will be available online at 10 am at Frontpage.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 74 other followers