Ben Rawshark has had another wee splurge on Twitter today and in response there’s an interesting claim – that Rawshark dumped and ran.
I’ve lost a lot of support, followers and ‘credibility’ in the last 7 days since the story broke in MSM. Fortunately the cops are digging.
He can smear any truth tellers that pop up using proxy blogs, analysis of the tellers enemies and rarking them up.
Yes, Scientology does exactly the same thing. You might want to study the history of the movement against them.
He is extremely good at what he does. Look at how they hit Catton. She is wholly light side. It’s the state of play now.
Haha Project Chanology? Or something non-hacktivist? I’m not newborn to Scientologies BS.
This is stuff that both pre-dates and post-dates Chanology. But Chanology was a decisive moment because you can’t smear Anon.
General chitchat with Daphne Lawless who describes themselves:
Musician, indexer, translator, political activist, footballer, sci-fi geek… if you are a renaissance woman, start a renaissance (after Ché Guevara)Auckland, Aotearoa
She’s of political and media interest, with followers like Sue Bradford, Laila Harre, Duncan Garner, Tova O’Brien, Bryce Edwards.
Slater is powerful because he’s useful to those in power. The correct strategy would be to end his usefulness.
So ideally one of Slater’s good buddies could be persuaded to turn against him.
…and then exchange tweets…
But that’s the beginning and the end of it. I was burying my grandmother as I dealt with it all. I apologised to QoT.
Even if you were a serial arsehole as bad as Slater, I STILL wouldn’t dismiss your revelations about Slater.
I appreciate that. I admire your quest for facts, proof and the truth. Don’t push them too hard though. They don’t like that.
Ever thought of doing a Rawshark? Dox dump to friendly journos then skipping the country?
That was tried and it didn’t work .. Whistleblowing under own name doesn’t work. It’s not the facts… It’s what happens after
How friendly was Rawshark to the journalists? Those who were given access to Rawshark data and reported on it were David Fisher of NZ Herald and Matt Nippert of Sunday Star Times.
Familiar names in the current hacking story.
And did they then leave New Zealand?
And a wee search finds that Cameron Slater had an interest in Daphne Lawless, claiming she had non-public information about the Rawshark hacking.
Meet Daphne Lawless, an aptly named hard left political activist who likes to blog like the big kids
She published an article on the Marxist Fightback blog (Struggle! Socialism! Fightback!), a post titled The Whale Oil leaks: Anti-politics from above.
In it, she writes:
The 8 and the 2 keys are not next to each other on a keyboard, so I assume that was exactly what she meant to type.
How does Daphne Lawless know the 8GB stick only contained 2GB data?
She seems to know a bit about Rawshark and friends.