People power sold down the river?

The NZ Herald reports on Asset sales threat stirs first-time protester.

“This is the first protest I’ve ever been to. I’m here for all New Zealanders.”

Good on her for attending and feeling motivated enough, but she was there for herself, not for “all New Zealanders.”

“It’s pretty cool. I feel like I’m making a difference, instead of just staying home.”

If she felt good about “making a difference” then yeah, cool. But I wonder whether the time and energy spent on “we must do something” could find a better goal, one that was achievable and could make a significant difference.

The stark reality is that MOM share floats, or not, will make little difference overall. Anti asset sales has been sold to political consumerists who may think they’re momentarily loving it but smoothing a few wrinkles won’t turn the age old clock back.

The main motivation for anti asset sales seems to have been little more than a consolation campaign for those who lost the last election.

The election was last year.

Imagine if all the effort put into being anti was instead focussed on pro positive initiatives, like job generation.

The anti asset sales protests include claims of exercising people power, but it’s more like failed parties from the last election recruiting gullible people.

People power is where people gather in strength, not where politicians fool the weak in their futile folly.

If an enthusiasm for making our democracy and politics better could be generated then people power may be much better harnessed. At the moment it seems like it’s being sold down the river by politicians who are stuck in the past.

Edit: a comment in response:

Fighting the next election by campaigning early on last years election issues shows how visionless and bankrupt the left are. They even have to use tax payers money to get signitures for their referendum.

Each time the news show the assemblage using the same old worn banners with the same faces it gets more embarrassing.

A lot of energy going nowhere. They need to pick their battles more carefully or maybe this is all they have got.

http://www.trademe.co.nz/Community/MessageBoard/Messages.aspx?id=1072891&topic=7

roganstant

roganstant

How much do votes costs?

Bryce Edwards blogged yesterday about the vost of the Te Taikerau by election and election costs generally.

Hone Harawira proved that themigth and coffers of a large party don’t guarantee success.

He is said to have spent less than half of the $40,000 legal limit, and he used no parliamentary resources in fighting the campaign. His opponents, of course, utilised considerably more resources…

… as has been shown countless other times, although such capital resources are useful in politics, they are far from the essential and dominating part of explaining success or failure in politics.

When it comes down to it – and as the Act Party has consistently illustrated – you can’t simply ‘buy votes’ by spending more and more money on advertising.

Good, unless some generous donors pop out of the woodwork I’ll have a very modest budget (in dollars).

An attractive political ‘product’ is much more important than the advertising budget.

That’s what we’re banking on. Our political product is attractive to many ordinary people who wouldn’t think of putting money into a campaign.

In any case the most valuable currencies are:

  • Time – contact as many people as possible, in person, in social media and via the traditional media if they ever get around to giving any attention to minor candidates.
  • Votes – it’s free to vote, but total votes are the only value that matters in the end.

We’ll be pushing word of mouth, the grapevine, social networks and any other way we can find to sell our message – and we’ll see if people power can still rule.

If enough ordinary people give their votes for free the result could be priceless.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 74 other followers