Who’s in the team?

Twitter can be a bit of a mess of comments at times but it can be possible to piece together some common associations. Here’s a series of tweets from a short period of time last night.

Lauda Finem @Laudafinem Aug 19
@PeteDGeorge but @tereoputake has also established, for team LF at least, something far more important 😉

Lauda Finem @Laudafinem Aug 19
We somehow doubt that…

Lauda Finem @Laudafinem Aug 19
We just knew…

Lauda Finem @Laudafinem Aug 19
We know that…

So that seems to establish that Laudas Finem see themselves as a team. Who’s in that team? And who just has frequent associations? Here’s a few tweets form the last few weeks.

Lauda Finem ‏@Laudafinem Jul 31
“(Not so) Dirty Politics: Police clear blogger” interesting @nzherald doesn’t use Slater’s name when cleared of wrongdoing @ShayneCurrieNZH

[Deleted as per court order]@[Deleted as per court order] Aug 1
@PeteDGeorge @Whaleoil @nzherald all of the above #hatchetjob

[Deleted as per court order]g ‏@[Deleted as per court order] Aug 3
@Whaleoil @Laudafinem @nzherald @ShayneCurrieNZH that’s because @Whaleoil they have an agenda – and they are a pack of cunts

[Deleted as per court order] ‏@[Deleted as per court order] Aug 3
@Laudafinem @nzherald @ShayneCurrieNZH no surprise there. The get Slater Team not doing so well @Whaleoil

Another team reference.

[Deleted as per court order] ‏@[Deleted as per court order] Aug 4
@Whaleoil @ColinCraigNZ just got my flyer in the mail – very timely as I just ran out of shit paper mid dump! @Laudafinem

There seems to be some common associations.

Pete George ‏@PeteDGeorge Jul 30
@[Deleted as per court order] and it’s fairly obvious you’re trying to be helpful to @Laudafinem

[Deleted as per court order] ‏@[Deleted as per court order] Jul 30
@PeteDGeorge @Laudafinem and that makes me what Pete?

An open admission.

[Deleted as per court order] ‏@[Deleted as per court order] Jul 30
@PeteDGeorge oh how one eyed are. Go read the 3 REAA/Honey stories at WO – tell me who got fucked over.

Pete George ‏@PeteDGeorge Jul 30
@[Deleted as per court order] Who’s agenda? Haven’t you just revealed that @LaudaFinem are working with @WhaleOil ?

[Deleted as per court order] ‏@[Deleted as per court order] Jul 30
@PeteDGeorge ahh so your moaning about your upcomig court issues with the doc you got served @Laudafinem

[Deleted as per court order] ‏@[Deleted as per court order] Jul 30
@Laudafinem @PeteDGeorge he’s writing a post about it

At that stage very few people knew about the ‘court issues’. [Deleted as per court order] obviously did, he brought the topic up. He also associated @Laudafinem. And he seems to suggest that @WhaleOil was writing a post about it.

This all suggests some teamwork on Twitter.

I haven’t seen a post at Whale Oil, yet. I’d be surprised if Cameron Slater wants to be seen to be too closely involved with ‘Team LF” at this stage, he has enough legal issues to deal with as it is at the moment. But there is court evidence that he has been closely associated with [Deleted as per court order] in the past.

Lauda Finem @Laudafinem Aug 19
We’re collectors @PeteDGeorge, we collect evidence and then we distribute it via LF to those who might need it to defend or prosecute 😉

There are some hints that Slater may have been quietly helping, unless there have been some unusual coincidences.

The latest distribution of ‘evidence’ via LF is this post on Monday – New Zealand IRD – The Blomfield frauds, the liquidators, the lawyers, the police and the media collaborators.

‘Team LF’ make serious allegations against a number of people, including myself. If they are as far off the mark with others as they are with me then they could find that a number of organisatiionsand people who have some interest in who is in ‘Team LF’.

Just the other day New Zealand’s Whale Oil Blog ran a couple of stories on a series of fraud and corruption allegations inveigling New Zealand’s Inland Revenue Department (IRD). Whilst the journo responsible, Stephen Cook, would undoubtedly have preferred that those involved be named the Whale Oil blog is unable to do so.

The Whale Oil association again.

The ring leader involved is a protected species in New Zealand for legal reasons that the courts have so far foolishly entertained.

Team Lauda Finem however have no such limitations as we are not subject to New Zealand’s laws, its courts or the bullshit gag order Whale Oil has been subjected to.

Complaining about gagging made me gag.

As aforesaid we here at LF have no such limitations when it comes to who we can name.

And they name names, including Government departments, companies, and I gave up counting after twenty individiuals were named. This adds to numerous targets in past posts.

Some of what they say indicates a knowledge of information that that I don’t think is public. For example:

Interestingly, once again APN’s New Zealand Herald, Herald on Sunday and the independently owned Otago Daily Times have been implicated in a conspiracy to conduct a smear campaign…

And:

LF’s investigations into these two particular cases over the past four years has now been expanded. We’re now also looking very closely at the behaviour of at least two political blogs, the New Zealand Labour Party aligned The Standard and another Dunedin based publication, Your NZ.

I have emails and court documents that make it clear who individuals are that are involved with ‘Team LF’. I’m sure I’m not the only one with evidence. This latest LF post amounts to a brazen admission of association.

Team Lauda Finem however have no such limitations as we are not subject to New Zealand’s laws,

I wouldn’t be surprised if there are a number of companies and individuals lining up to claim otherwise. It appears that Team Lauda Finem may think they can post what they like online with impunity, and they may think they can threaten and intimidate people into silence.

Unless someone stupid is shitting in the team nest. It’s hard to fathom who in the team would think their latest post would help their case. Or cases.

WARNING: Please don’t answer “Who’s in the team?” with names or any way of indentifying individuals. I suspect that all those who need to know, know. Any comments that risk legal action will be edited or deleted. It’s been obvious that members of ‘Team Lauda Finem’ have been commenting here using a variety of pseudonyms trying to create problems.

Most commenters are fine as lomg as you show common sense and prudence. Those who are part of the LF team have been easy to identify.

NOTE: I’ve left the comments of a dirty diverter intact in comments to show what depths some people will lower themselves to when they don’t have an argument and don’t like the message.

Leave a comment

46 Comments

  1. Mike C

     /  20th August 2015

    @George

    It certainly looks as though there may be an alliance of some kind between LF and the Whale.

    I have thought for ages now, that Blubber Boy and the Brothers Grimm are connected in some way.

    It is going to be interesting to see how this all plays out 🙂

    Reply
    • Kevin

       /  20th August 2015

      I don’t think so. To me it seems that LF and WO both have a common enemy in Hager and Rawshark. I know that if I found evidence that for example Hager paid Rawshark to hack Slater’s email I wouldn’t hesitate to tell WO. Doesn’t mean I’m aligned with them.

      Reply
      • Dave

         /  20th August 2015

        @Kevin Agree, i do not believe WO is part of the LF team, but they both feature serious fraudsters / criminal types. There might have been some info exchanges, but in the past LF have been very very critical of CS and WO, to the point of posting a picture of him labelled …….tard.

        Reply
    • kittycatkin

       /  20th August 2015

      I think that LF is using the royal or editorial we. How pompous.

      Reply
  2. Interesting PG you choose to upload tweets in a context that potentially suits you. why? perhaps you are working with Blomfield to try and get some advantage ahead of the Courts. Your actions are classic Blomfield MO – spread as much shit as you can. And if your wrong on your accusations what will you do?

    Reply
    • I’m a mere casual observer of all these goings on. They remind me of 8-10 year old kids in the neighbourhood (pre electronic communication days.) Disputes about this and that.

      What struck me was “classic Blomfield MO – spread as much shit as you can.” Is that Blomfield joker unique? Did he invent that strategy? One prominent shit spreader claims to have been doing it since 2003. Shit is shit, it comes in different forms. Get out on the farm, go to the zoo and see.

      Reply
        • Mike C

           /  20th August 2015

          @GoatCum

          Look at how many comments Slater himself has written in that Post !!!

          It almost appears as if he is “explaining” … and we all know what that means. LOL.

          Reply
        • Pakuranga mum of 3

           /  20th August 2015

          @ GOAT

          Yes, a somewhat disturbing post on WO. If the ‘evidence’ does indeed stack up, it will be very interesting to follow.

          However, may I say you do your own credibility no favors when posting under such a distasteful and revolting pseudonym. Please grow up!

          Reply
          • Dave

             /  20th August 2015

            Why is it a disturbing post, it appears t ohave credibility, a later comment by CS states to have afidavits etc, so unless someone has lied in a sworn statement……

            Reply
            • Mike C

               /  20th August 2015

              @Dave

              Yeah … but how many times has Slater said he has evidence of this thing or that … but then it never materialises.

            • Dave

               /  20th August 2015

              @MikeC He always has evidence – the old rule, never ask the question unless you know the answers

            • Remember that Slater has claimed he embellished things.

            • jamie

               /  20th August 2015

              I think he has claimed a lot more than that. I think I remember him saying he had no problem with outright lying in service of his goals as the ends justify it, or words to that effect.

    • Mike C

       /  20th August 2015

      @GoatCum

      You are being somewhat melo-dramatic, because this post by George could hardly be considered accusatory, as I would describe the content in this post as being thoughtful musings. LOL.

      If Slater and Lauda Finem have not made an alliance in any way … then they both have the right to come in here and state exactly that 🙂

      Reply
    • kittycatkin

       /  20th August 2015

      Poor old Goat. I somehow think that the thumbs up on Goat’s messages have been put there by Goat himself. What a sad lonely loser Goat must be. All alone by the telephone.

      Reply
  3. Pakuranga mum of 3

     /  20th August 2015

    There seems to be a few ‘weird & wonderful’ pseudonyms appearing here lately, particularly on this particular topic. You’d have to wonder if some of the people using them are quite the full quid……. 😦

    Reply
    • Mike C

       /  20th August 2015

      @Pakuranga Mum

      I second that !!! LOL.

      Reply
      • kittycatkin

         /  20th August 2015

        You beat your pate
        And fancy wit will come;
        Knock as you will,
        There’s nobody at home.

        Alexander Pope

        (who would have rhymed home and come in the c.18)

        Reply
  4. missy

     /  20th August 2015

    @Pakurangamum and some of those pseudonyms are quite tasteless which probably shows the level of maturity, not to mention the mindset of the person/people behind them.

    Reply
    • Pete Kane

       /  20th August 2015

      I agree, some of these names are designed specifically offend and dissuade people from participating (and enjoying) the site.

      Reply
      • kittycatkin

         /  20th August 2015

        I agree, too. They are obviously trying to shock-but they are trying too hard. It’s barely capping mag level.

        Goat, we’ve all heard that word and know what it means. Don’t bother. It undermines your chances of being taken seriously if you resort to childish attempts to shock the grown-ups. As someone who has read literature from the era of Roman Classics to the present, I have heard worse than that, and I am not impressed.

        Reply
        • kittycatkin

           /  20th August 2015

          I took Pakuranga Mum to be just a funny pseudonym, though 🙂

          Reply
    • Mike C

       /  20th August 2015

      @Missy

      I don’t have a problem with Pakuranga Mums username … but I do have a problem with GOAT CUM TASTES BEST 😦

      Reply
      • Missy

         /  20th August 2015

        Mike, I am sorry if you thought I had a problem with Pakuranga Mums username, it is not her username I was referring to, I was (in a clumsy way I think) agreeing with her on the interesting pseudonyms, and pointing out some are rather tasteless – meaning Goats, which I find incredibly tasteless and immature.

        Reply
        • its not tasteless – quite tangy in fact

          Reply
          • Mike C

             /  20th August 2015

            @Goat-Cum

            Does your Mrs Goat feel the same way about its taste as you do?

            Reply
            • Mrs Mike C reckons its the bet flavour she ever had ! She gobbed it up big time.

            • Ok, here’s a warning. I’ve left your comments and username as posted because it demonstrates the way you try to operate, but this sort of dirt is not welcome here, and neither are you nor any alternate usernames that are tried with this sort of dirty diversion.

  5. missy

     /  20th August 2015

    @goat I don’t think Pete is spreading shit, but if he is it is no different to a lot of blogs who seem to spread shit and hope some of it sticks – LF & WO come to mind instantly for that tactic, I suppose at least Pete and WO identify who they are publicly when writing, and don’t hide behind a pseudonym having the appearance of being cowards.

    Reply
    • jamie

       /  20th August 2015

      While that’s clearly true of Pete, according to the material Rawshark hacked/stole/whatever it would seem that we really have no idea who is writing what at WO. Apparently people can pay a fee and have their post published under the name “Cameron Slater”. That goes well beyond hiding behind a pseudonym and into far murkier, muckier waters.

      Reply
      • Dave

         /  20th August 2015

        Don’t agree with you there Jamie, WO regularly posts “guest” articles, and CS’s writing style is quite obvious. If your questioning paid publishing, i suggest you have a serious look at the MSM, particularly PG’s own home town publication, or “A Newspaper” based in Auckland, with their Native Advertising and journo team who seem to use it as a corporate PR service.

        Reply
        • jamie

           /  20th August 2015

          According to the Rawshark material, which as far as I understand Cameron Slater accepts as having been stolen from him, that is exactly what happens/happened at WO.

          Reply
          • Dave

             /  20th August 2015

            And of course, Rawsharks release was not at all selective!! It was a politically motivated hit designed to tkae CS and WO down, nothing moer, nothing less.

            Reply
            • jamie

               /  20th August 2015

              I’m sure it was politically motivated, Slater is a political figure. However that doesn’t make it any more or less true. And everything is selective, so you always have to keep an open mind and be aware of what’s not being said as much as what is.

              Slater has plenty of avenues both legal and otherwise to set the record straight if he feels he has been misrepresented. As far as I know he hasn’t done that yet.

            • Dave

               /  20th August 2015

              The police still have an open file, my belief is CS knows who organised the hack, and who did it, but is waiting until th epolice act, or perhaps a Book.

            • Yes, I think that’s the case. There’s a few things Slater can’t talk publicly about due to ongoing investigations and legal actions, or it’s not prudent to talk about – for example Colin Craig keeps own goaling.

              But that doesn’t rule out a but of bluff and bluster.

            • jamie

               /  20th August 2015

              Ah yes, good points Dave and Pete.

      • Kevin

         /  20th August 2015

        Possibly at one time but I’ve never seen a post published under the name “Cameron Slater” that wasn’t obviously written by Cameron. There were a lot of smears written in Dirty Politics about WO the site, smears that were blatantly not true as people found out when they actually went and visited the site.

        Reply
        • jamie

           /  20th August 2015

          Not sure what you mean by smears. What could anyone possibly make up about Slater that he hasn’t actually done or said?

          Reply
  6. you have to say the comment of [Edited as per court order] on Colin Craigs flyer is bloody funny

    Reply
    • Mike C

       /  20th August 2015

      @Goat

      What did [Edited as per court order] say?

      Reply
    • Mike C

       /  20th August 2015

      @TheGoat

      Oh … you meant about [Edited as per court order] using the pamphlet as toilet paper.

      You are very crass … and you don’t have anything remotely resembling a normal sense of humour.

      Somethings wrong with you 😦

      Reply
      • kittycatkin

         /  20th August 2015

        That ‘joke’ has probably been around since loo paper has. Yawn.

        Reply
        • Alan Wilkinson

           /  20th August 2015

          Possibly someone who can only tell a sheep from a goat by the above method has just had the joke explained to him?

          Reply
  7. kittycatkin

     /  20th August 2015

    I don’t know what Goat’s reason for being here is, but his sense of humour seems to have become stuck at 14 year old level-the age when boys find it excruciatingly funny to make crass jokes, thinking that filth is funny. It’s excusable-just-in a pubescent boy whose hormones are going mad, but sad and pathetic in an adult who has no such excuse. Anyone over 14 who’s still making this sort of remark and whose mind is at the filth is funny level that most people outgrow when they begin to have real relationships has something seriously wrong with them and needs help.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: