James Shaw: Green AGM speech

Green co-leader James Shaw gave the leaders’ keynote speech at the party AGM.

Video is about 17 minutes into this (after Little’s speech):

That’s not Shaw and Turei in the video still, it just shows what it wants, which is Andrew Little (obviously) and the person doing sign language.

James Shaw, 2016 AGM speech – Change Starts Now

Kia tau te rangimārie o te Rangi e tū nei

o Papatūānuku e takoto nei

o te Taiao e awhi nei

ki runga i a tātou.

Tīhei mauri ora!

He mihi nui ki ngā mana whenua o tēnei takiwā, Ngāi Tahu, Tuahuriri, tēnā koutou katoa mō tō manaakitanga.

Ki a koutou e te whānau o Te Rōpū Kākāriki, harikoa ana ahau ki te kite i a koutou i tēnei rā.

Ka mihi hoki ki a koe Andrew, me te rōpū reipa, tēnā koutou.

 

Nō reira, tēnā tātou katoa.

This is the moment.

When New Zealand elects the first Labour – Green government in 18 months, this is the moment we will remember.

We will look to the agreement that we signed with Labour this week.

We will look to when Andrew Little joined us at our AGM.

We will look to the moment when we sent a message of hope to New Zealand that change is coming.

Andrew, I welcome you here today. We welcome you. Thank you for coming.

In the time that I’ve gotten to know you, you’ve demonstrated to me that you’re a person of great integrity. You are someone who brings people together. And you don’t shy away from trying to tackle the really difficult challenges.

That’s why I want to work with you. And that’s why I felt I could sign our agreement with you this week on behalf of the Green Party.

Like us, Labour has a commitment to taking on the tough problems, the long term structural challenges in our society: the economy, health, education, jobs, the environment.

Labour also has a track record in government of having done that – the Super Fund, Working for Families, Kiwisaver – these are multi-decade solutions to structural challenges in New Zealand society.

That’s why this Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Greens is so important.

It’s why Andrew’s presence here today is a break in the clouds.

Labour and the Greens have different histories. We have different values. We don’t agree on everything.

But we share a belief in the ability of government to transform things for the better. To find real solutions to real problems.

To find jobs and homes and hope for those that need them.

The first Labour Government helped transform New Zealand into the great, caring compassionate society that many of us were born into.

Over the months I’ve been in Parliament, and particularly in the year I’ve been Co-leader, I’ve travelled a lot around the country.

And one of the things that has really struck me has been the growing sense of discomfort about what kind of country we’re becoming.

Families living in cars and garages. Poisoned rivers. Saudi sheep scandals.

From the doorsteps of suburban New Zealand to corporate boardrooms, people are telling me that this doesn’t feel like the country they grew up in.

And it’s not the country we want to become.

It doesn’t sit with our sense of compassion and fairness, our love of our land, of how we think about ourselves.

My hope is that with the first Labour-Green government we’ll find ourselves again.

Since we signed our agreement with Labour, some commentators have asked me – why not go with National?

My answer is that in eight years, we’ve seen no evidence that National are willing or able to tackle the big challenges.

They have dealt with the superficial, they have allowed and encouraged the big structural problems to grow – they have simply plastered over the cracks.

When they should have been building houses.

My answer is that there is no substance to what they do. Their focus is on making it sound like they’re a good government, not actually being one.

They are more concerned about managing the politics around serious issues like poverty and pollution than they are about solving the problems.

This government wants us in a perpetual state of distraction over what it pretends to be doing.

Faced with the really big challenges in front of New Zealand and the world today the National Government throws its hands up in defeat, or resorts to playground-style “she did it” blame tactics.

My answer is that in fact their real “accomplishments” are things they never talk about.

 

The poisoning of our lands and waters.
The rapid decline and threat of extinction for hundreds of our native species.
A catastrophic increase in our greenhouse gas emissions.
More and more trucks clogging our roads.
A housing crisis and a homelessness crisis.
Hundreds of thousands of children growing up in poverty.

These are things they never campaigned on, never sought a mandate for, because they are things that the majority of New Zealanders oppose.

But they are the real legacy of this Government.

The challenge of government lies in actually confronting and solving those very real problems.

In the last few weeks we’ve learned that the Minister of Primary Industries can’t do anything to prevent illegal overfishing and dumping of fish stocks.

The Housing Ministers – there are three of them, because no single person can create a housing crisis this terrible on their own – can’t do anything about the homeless crisis.

The Social Development Minister can’t do anything about child poverty.

The Finance Minister can’t do anything about the property bubble.

All of their knowledge and talent and ingenuity is dedicated to pretending these aren’t real problems, and then coming up with pretend solutions to them.

Plastering over the cracks.

But these are real problems that cause real damage to our wildlife and our precious places, to the economy, to jobs and to the social fabric of New Zealand.

Whenever National is confronted with these real problems, their ideological blinkers get in the way and they pretend they’re powerless.

That is why we need change. And change is coming.

I want to give New Zealand a better vision of the future.

It’s a future where, on your weekends away, you’ll go to sleep at night safely knowing that the same beach that you’re enjoying now will still be here for future generations, unthreatened by rising seas.

In the morning, you’ll be woken by a dawn chorus from flocks of birds that once bordered on extinction.

After lunch you’ll pack the family into your electric car and head safely home on uncongested roads while your kids count the containers on the freight trains running on the tracks alongside you.

If you’ve got time, you might even stop by a river on your way home – and actually swim in it!

On Monday morning in New Zealand, you’ll catch the tram into town, and head off to some social enterprise or a clean-tech start-up, for a day of meaningful work, making the world just a little bit better and, while you’re at it, earning a fair day’s pay.

When you’re done, you’ll head back to your warm, dry, family home, a place you can call your own, secure in the knowledge that at the end of the month you’ve got enough to pay the rent or the mortgage and still put plenty of food on the table.

Your neighbours will be from all walks of life. The children of Syrian refugees will play with those of Chinese migrants, Pasifika and Tangata Whenua and seventh generation Pakeha.

Some will be doing well, some will be getting by.

But they’re you’re neighbours, and when someone gets into trouble, you pitch in to help out. Our communities will be connected, caring.

That’s the country I want to live in. That’s the future I’m committed to.

It’s not flashy or grandiose. It’s not science fiction. It’s just a better world and it is entirely possible.

If we change the Government. And change is coming.

And when people say to me, “OK then, I’ll vote for change, but why should I vote Green?” I’ll say to them, “I’m glad you asked me that question, Andrew!”

You should vote Green because we’ll protect our lakes and beaches and sea beds, because we’ll bring our endangered species back from the brink of extinction.

You should vote Green because we will clean up our rivers and make sure that those who profit from the use of water recognise that nature doesn’t come for free.

We will stop pretending that climate change isn’t a problem. Isn’t, in fact, the greatest challenge of our time. Of all time.

You should vote Green because the Green Party can and will start one of the most important shifts to take place in New Zealand over the next fifty years – the transition to a low carbon economy.

You should vote Green because we can and will build an economy and a society that works for everyone.

And you should vote Green because we will put the people of New Zealand back at the heart of our democracy.

We want policies to be written by experts and policy specialists, not lobbyists.

We want the voices of children, families and communities to be heard.

And we want Te Tiriti to be properly recognised – in practice – not just in words.

The difference between the Green Party and National is that we know that New Zealand can be the fairer, smarter and cleaner place that all Kiwis want.

National is still making excuses for why we can’t.

But changing the Government isn’t just about Metiria and me, and it’s not just about Andrew and Annette.

It’s about you.

I believe that a Labour – Green Government after next year’s General Election is entirely possible.

There’s only about five points in it, between the Labour-Green bloc and National, and I believe that the momentum building behind us, as a credible, stable alternative government, could get us over the line.

But I gotta tell you, we need to get real about what we’re up against.

National has built a formidable political machine, with millions of dollars and powerful vested interests behind it who are desperate to preserve the status quo.

In order to take on this machine, we need you. And we’re going to need everything you’ve got.

We need you on the streets, we need you on the phones, we need you on Facebook, on Instagram, at parties, spreading the word, building the movement for change.

Sure, we don’t have millions of dollars, but we’ve got two important tools at our disposal that National doesn’t.

The first thing we’ve got, which National demonstrably doesn’t, is vision.

A vision of a truly sustainable and inclusive country that, actually, all Kiwis want.

And that is much, much more potent than National’s line that this is as good as it gets.

And the second thing we’ve got, is you.

It’s time for a Government that cares. It’s time for government that puts our people and our natural world at the centre of everything it does.

It’s time for a Government that realises that when our environment and society is stronger, our economy is stronger.

It is time to change the Government. And change is coming.

Nō reira, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā tātou katoa.

 

Leave a comment

26 Comments

  1. PDB

     /  4th June 2016

    Shaw: “When New Zealand elects the first Labour – Green government in 18 months, this is the moment we will remember”

    I’m sure Winston will remember when he decides to go with National after the next election………as someone else said: Two losers joining together does not instantly make a winner.

    Reply
    • Corky

       /  4th June 2016

      That’s really putting the knife in deep PDB. As Winnie would say: ‘ two Wongs don’t make a right.’

      Reply
      • PDB

         /  4th June 2016

        The Greens have generally got by because their policies don’t face the same scrutiny from the MSM due to their relative unimportant political position – they may have to be careful for what the wish for if they do become more visible from now on.

        Reply
        • Corky

           /  4th June 2016

          You are right. More media attention may find holes and contradictions in their policies. That’s before we even get to what Labour will and won’t accept as part of a coalition.
          Honestly, what a bloody train wreck.

          Reply
          • Kitty Catkin

             /  4th June 2016

            The runaway party came down the track and she blew…

            Reply
  2. Corky

     /  4th June 2016

    He opens with a mihi in Maori. Kiss goodbye to dissatisfied racist votes looking for a new home.

    “From the doorsteps of suburban New Zealand to corporate boardrooms, people are telling me that this doesn’t feel like the country they grew up in.”

    Damn, I have to agree with that.

    “Your neighbours will be from all walks of life. The children of Syrian refugees will play with those of Chinese migrants, Pasifika and Tangata Whenua and seventh generation Pakeha”

    I know its a feel-good speech. But that is bullshit. Arrant rubbish.

    “You should vote Green because we can and will build an economy and a society that works for everyone.”

    Except rich pricks, right James? You just want their money- nothing else.

    “And we want Te Tiriti to be properly recognised – in practice – not just in words.”

    In that case put aside one trillion dollars to compensate New Zealanders for the treaty being properly recognised and implemented. All seven treaties.

    “National has built a formidable political machine, with millions of dollars and powerful vested interests behind it who are desperate to preserve the status quo.”

    Too true. Nice of a Lefty to admit the obvious.

    “The first thing we’ve got, which National demonstrably doesn’t, is vision”

    Sad too say, that’s a direct hit. Pity he ruined it with:.

    ‘And the second thing we’ve got, is you.”

    Yeah, but not the rest of New Zealand.

    Not a bad effort. But I doubt many Righties will be choking on their muesli.

    .

    Reply
  3. Gezza

     /  4th June 2016

    The children of Syrian refugees will play with those of Chinese migrants, Pasifika and Tangata Whenua and seventh generation Pakeha.

    It’s the ones who’re not – who’re inside on the internet watching ISIS & Al Qaeda videos that worry me.

    And when people say to me, “OK then, I’ll vote for change, but why should I vote Green?” I’ll say to them, “I’m glad you asked me that question, Andrew!”

    You should vote Green because we’ll protect our lakes and beaches and sea beds, because we’ll bring our endangered species back from the brink of extinction.

    You should vote Green because we will clean up our rivers and make sure that those who profit from the use of water recognise that nature doesn’t come for free.

    Seriously? He wants Andrew to vote Green?

    A lot of it was pretty good though. Good on him for the mihi.

    Reply
    • Kitty Catkin

       /  4th June 2016

      Speeches in Maori that go on too long bore those who can’t follow-and I wonder how much they impress Maori listeners. It can sound like bum-crawling.

      What a big nothing of a speech.

      Reply
      • Sorry Kitty, its part of being a being a Kiwi, and is the normal protocol for a mixed audience of Maori and non-Maori. Consider it as the relish to the meal the speech is supposed to provide!

        Reply
        • Kitty Catkin

           /  4th June 2016

          I have been to many events where it was done-and one can see that even those who can understand it are bored. Keep it brief.It sounds like showing off when a Pakeha does it and goes on and on, anyway.

          I wonder how many people need/ed the sign language. None, probably.

          Reply
          • Gezza

             /  4th June 2016

            That wasn’t at all too long Kitty. And it went down really well with the Maori who were there.

            Reply
            • Gezza

               /  4th June 2016

              I wonder how many people need/ed the sign language. None, probably.

              Don’t tell me you’ve got it in for deaf people now? Was Mojo Mathers there? Do you know? How do you know how many others in the audience might have been deaf? What about other people who might be deaf who might want to watch the speeches on Social Media or on the Party Websites?

              This is the last thing I would’ve expected you to say. I think you should be ashamed of yourself for that remark, tbh. >:D

          • pickled possum

             /  4th June 2016

            Cats used to be gods in ancient Egyptian times and they still think they are!
            Ancient cats in today’s times …

            Reply
  4. The answer to whom will form the next Government will depend on the money backing the campaigns of the parties. It will be the old truism – follow the money. I would love to take James out to the real outback of New Zealand to enjoy the pristine thousands if not millions of acres of the areas he describes in his speech, and gently remind him that the more he talks about how bad things are, the more he trashes his own country – tell him to spend a month in Java and then compare the environments. Stop trashing New Zealand Greens should be the message!

    Reply
    • Kitty Catkin

       /  4th June 2016

      Excellent point, Bj-don’t rubbish your own country-and by extension the people thereof-that is a very bad move. Antagonising people is not a vote-catcher. How many fans did Heather du Plessis Allen make in Ngaruawahia by her remarks ?

      I don’t think that the answer to who will be the next government is entirely money based, though.

      This speech was a non-starter in my opinion.

      Reply
      • Gezza

         /  4th June 2016

        What did HdPA say about Ngaruawahia Kitty?

        Why don’t you like the Maori language? You know Latin don’t you?

        Reply
        • Kitty Catkin

           /  4th June 2016

          I didn’t say anywhere that I didn’t like it, only that speeches in it tend to go on and on, and then there’s the English one to follow. I have been at a few events where even the Maori eyes have been glazed over after a while.

          She said, among other things, that it wasn’t even good enough to stop in for a pee (repeated a few times, if I remember right) and people should hold on and not stop there if they needed a pee. It was childish, insulting and baseless and the people were unimpressed by this sophisticate from the city and her remarks.

          Reply
          • Gezza

             /  4th June 2016

            Well they have do the English one to follow it Kitty or otherwise us ignorant people who don’t know the native language of our own country wouldn’t have any idea what they were saying.

            Oh yeah I do remember that dopey HdPA remark now, thanks. I realised what an air-head she is when she forged a cop’ s name & bought that rifle online. You’ve just reminded me she’s not an really an air-head, she’s a vacuum-head.

            Reply
  5. Pete Kane

     /  4th June 2016

    acknowledging you have to choose from what you have to choose from – I thought the Greens made a mistake in selecting Shaw. And frankly (and it appears I’m in the minority) nothing I have heard or seen since has altered that view.

    Reply
    • Pete Kane

       /  4th June 2016

      Ed Sorry “made a mistake in selecting”

      Reply
      • I’ve edited your first comment.

        I have quite a bit if respect for Hague but sort of understood why they might take a punt on Shaw. But so far he doesn’t seem to have stepped up. A big job for an MP barely into their first term, even though only co-leader, but he isn’t impressing much outside his party.

        And he seems to have been outmanoevered by the MoU. He looked like an out of sorts bystander at the announcement.

        Reply
        • Pete Kane

           /  4th June 2016

          Thanks Pete. Pete !. Have you heard any of the rumours of Metiria Turei considering “retiring” and 2.do you know her at all? (Dunedin is where she lives for any that may not have been aware.)

          Reply
          • The only ‘rumour’ I have heard about her retiring is Bradbury in 5th Estate.

            I’ve met Metiria a few times. I stood against her in 2011 so got to know her a bit then. Don’t know her well but have seen how she operates from close up, she is good with crowds – friendly crowds at least, and most campaign meetings are stacked, at one she put Green advertising on all the seats before it started.

            Reply
            • Pete Kane

               /  4th June 2016

              Yea I saw the Bradbury show and in fact put on here somewhere. Will find. Wasn’t sure what to make of Locke’s comments (near the end). I heard of it through associates here in Wellington who happen to be Green members/volunteers and genuinely reliable . It was quite matter of fact and I gained the impression that Norman effectively beat her to it. I would have thought she was a person that could work quite well with a fair number of the NZ First crew, including the boss. She just gives me that impression.

              http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2016/06/03/waatea-5th-estate-left-wing-jedi-council-debate-the-labour-green-mou/

            • Gezza

               /  4th June 2016

              Yes I didn’t know what to make of that. Don’t know whether that might have been signalling she wanted to retire from politics or just step down as co-leader. Nandor Tanczos left because herealised he just couldn’t get the Green party to reach the kind of accommodation they’ve both just hinted at with the MoU.

  6. Pete Kane

     /  4th June 2016

    That panel were spot on with Labour’s core policy issues (or lack there of). Wayne Hope nailed it and I think you could agree his criticisms wherever you sit on political spectrum.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: