Further to Questionable sentence and suppression after criminal harassment the ODT has followed up today with more on the attempt to keep the person convicted of criminal harassment and intentional damage a secret.
A public servant who subjected a Dunedin businessman to “a living hell” for two and a-half years has finally been named – but his occupation remains under wraps.
Jeremy Fraser Buis (39), appearing in the Dunedin District Court yesterday, was sentenced to 200 hours’ community work and ordered to pay the victim $15,000 after being found guilty of criminal harassment, threatening to do grievous bodily harm and intentional damage, following a week-long, judge-alone trial last month.
The victim – Danny Pryde – voluntarily gave up his own name suppression yesterday and said he was “extremely surprised” Buis’ job was kept secret.
“I think that’s quite important for the public to know … his profession and I don’t know why they’d hold that back,” he said.
More than quite important, but there is some ‘Streisand effect’ in action because it has increased publicity and outrage.
Judge Paul Kellar gave no reasons for his decision, which was made after counsel Anne Stevens said publication of the job would cast aspersions on Buis’ colleagues.
Suppression hasn’t prevented aspersions being cast, in fact it has probably made it more likely.
University of Otago dean of law Prof Mark Henaghan said the situation was unusual and almost futile.
“Once the name is released, people can find out what he does,” he said.
It’s simple to find out, even without seeing or hearing it said all over the place (which is happening).
Police said he was released from court after sentencing through an “alternative exit”, rather than the public doors, to avoid conflict with the victim’s family.
“Avoidance of the media was not a consideration,” the spokesman said.
I don’t think that’s an issue. The suppression of Buis’ occupation is.
Mr Pryde, owner of Pryde Engineering, said he wanted to lift the lid on the ordeal which had permeated almost every area of his life.
“I’ve got a business to run and it’s extremely embarrassing trying to explain this to customers,” he said.
“I’m happy for them to read about it and sympathise if they feel the need to.”
Mr Pryde believed the sentence was light and described the $15,000 emotional-harm payment, which the court heard Buis had borrowed, as “dirty money”.
“I’d almost be prepared to give that away to charity. He tried to destroy my business and my marriage. [Money] doesn’t fix those things,” he said.
Danny is a good and innovative engineer. I don’t see them often now but Danny and his wife have always seemed to me to be very nice people. They, and no one, deserves to be treated this badly.
I think that continued suppression of Buis’ occupation is worse for his employer and his colleagues (or ex colleagues) than being open and up front about it.
NOTE: Nothing that reveals the occupation of Buis can be tolerated here.