Trump administration low on ethics

A Gallup poll rates the Trump administration the lowest on ethics of an administration since polling on ethics began in the 1980s.

Overall, how would you rate the ethical standards of top Trump administration officials — as excellent, good, not good or poor?

  • Excellent 7%
  • Good 30%
  • TOTAL FAVOURABLE 37%
  • Not good 19%
  • Poor 40%
  • TOTAL UNFAVOURABLE 59%

Gallup: Trump Administration Officials Get Low Marks on Ethics

  • Lowest administration ethics rating Gallup has measured
  • Contrary to typical pattern, Trump job approval exceeds ethics rating
  • May 1-10 Gallup poll.

With Trump approval ratings averaging on the low forties that suggests that some people don’t careย  much about ethics.

Past poll results:

The only other president below 50% was Bill Clinton and he recovered significantly.

Leave a comment

12 Comments

  1. Kitty Catkin

     /  May 25, 2018

    Oh dear ๐Ÿ˜€

    Reply
    • Corky

       /  May 25, 2018

      Well, I would save that until after the next presidential election, assuming Trump will contest it.

      Reply
  2. Zedd

     /  May 25, 2018

    ho ho hum.. Not good/POOR 59%

    as kitty sez “OH DEAR !” ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€

    Reply
  3. Alan Wilkinson

     /  May 25, 2018

    Would be interesting to see what Hillary would score. Tribal hatreds are dominant.

    Reply
    • Likely we will never know, I don’t expect she will ever be president.

      There’s reasonable results for Obama. Of course ethics isn’t a measure of effectiveness.

      Reply
  4. PartisanZ

     /  May 25, 2018

    Trump administration low on ethics …

    WTF … Trump administration NO on ethics …

    POTUS: “Ethics? What is that …?” (Latest Aide whispers in his ear)

    POTUS: “Ethics ……… You’re fired! (Then, to latest Aide) … You too!”

    Reply
  5. sorethumb

     /  May 25, 2018

    Trump administration low on ethics
    but does it matter. He bonked Stormy?

    Many pundits still think he can win again.

    What’s new: The Peterson phenomenon (for one thing).

    Reply
    • Gezza

       /  May 25, 2018

      The Peterson phenomenon imo is already Petering out. He’s the Eric Von Daaniken of pop philosophy. Gone the full ego trip now & probably already past his use by date. A few sad bastards might pick up something useful from his book telling young men to grow up and take some personal responsibility for not screwing up their own lives waiting for someone to give them one, and his point about free speech meaning you can say things some woolly woofter wankers don’t like is a good one, but the rest of what he blathers on about these days is mostly psychobabble.

      Reply
  6. sorethumb

     /  May 25, 2018

    [16:00]
    Why people overlook The Donald’s many fault and give him a vote

    Reply
    • Corky

       /  May 25, 2018

      ”They despise his sense of aesthetics. They can’t stomach someone like him in the highest office.”

      Spot on. Do some on this blog and other blogs hold similar views even thought they aren’t elite academics? But of course. Some are dumb struck. Words fail them. Eg:

      Kitty Catkin / May 25, 2018
      ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s