‘Accurate’ claims that Russia meddled to help Trump beat Clinton

After reviewing intelligence reports a US Senate committee says that findings that Russia ramped up attempts to interfere in the US election in 2016 and helped Donald Trump win were accurate.

Intel Committee Releases Unclassified Summary of Initial Findings on 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment

Today, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and Vice Chairman Mark Warner (D-VA) released the Committee’s unclassified summary of its initial findings on the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russian activities in the 2016 U.S. elections.

The Committee finds that the overall judgments issued in the ICA were well-supported and the tradecraft was strong. The course of the Committee’s investigation has shown that the Russian cyber operations were more extensive than the hack of the Democratic National Committee and continued well through the 2016 election.

Chairman Burr

“The Committee has spent the last 16 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft and analytic work underpinning the Intelligence Community Assessment and sees no reason to dispute the conclusions. The Committee continues its investigation and I am hopeful that this instalment of the Committee’s work will soon be followed by additional summaries providing the American people with clarity around Russia’s activities regarding U.S. elections.”

Vice Chairman Warner

“Our investigation thoroughly reviewed all aspects of the January 2017 ICA, which assessed that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign to target our presidential election and to destabilize our democratic institutions. As numerous intelligence and national security officials in the Trump administration have since unanimously re-affirmed, the ICA findings were accurate and on point.  The Russian effort was extensive and sophisticated, and its goals were to undermine public faith in the democratic process, to hurt Secretary Clinton and to help Donald Trump.  While our investigation remains ongoing, we have to learn from 2016 and do more to protect ourselves from attacks in 2018 and beyond.”

Investigations like this are for finding out what happened and try to prevent future interference.

Fox News – Findings that Russia meddled to help Trump beat Clinton were ‘accurate and on point’: Senate intel panel

The FBI’s and CIA’s “analytical disagreement” with the NSA over whether Russia sought to bolster the Trump presidential campaign was “reasonable,” the report also said.

While the FBI and CIA had “high confidence” that Russian President Vladimir Putin aspired to help Trump’s election chances by denigrating opponent Hillary Clinton, the NSA had only “moderate confidence” in that assessment, according to the January 2017 analysis.

The disagreement among agencies “was reasonable, transparent, and openly debated among the agencies and analysts, with analysts, managers and agency heads on both sides of the confidence level articulately justifying their positions,” the Senate intelligence committee’s findings said.

This further confirms what is fairly widely accepted – that Russia meddled in the election trying to help Trump.

Trump is due to meet with Vladimir Putin next month.

Leave a comment


  1. Kitty Catkin

     /  4th July 2018

    Has Trump ever explained how he met Putin, became a friend and appeared on television with him when Putin was out of the country at the time ?

  2. MaureenW

     /  4th July 2018

    Same day, another charge thrown out that Trump colluded with Russia to hack/publish the DNC emails.


    • The ruling was wrong jurisdiction, not that there was no collusion.

      Huvelle made clear that her decision was a technical one based on issues of legal jurisdiction and was not a definitive ruling on allegations that the Trump campaign struck an illicit deal with the Russians during the presidential contest.

      “It bears emphasizing that this Court’s ruling is not based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia during the 2016 presidential election,” Huvelle wrote. “This is the wrong forum for plaintiffs’ lawsuit. The Court takes no position on the merits of plaintiffs’ claims.”

      Emphasised “this Court’s ruling is not based on a finding that there was no collusion”.

  3. PDB

     /  4th July 2018

    You mean to say the Russians planted Hillary as Trump’s opponent as she was the only presidential candidate capable of losing to him?

    • MaureenW

       /  4th July 2018

      Yes, you’d have to wonder why Russia would want Trump. After all Bill and Hillary were well ensconced with Uranium 1 and Clinton Foundation/speaking fees for Bill. Obama was aware of Russian meddling but gave a stand down order to those supposedly investigating.

  4. Trevors_elbow

     /  4th July 2018


    And where is the collusion evidence?

    Russia influence on western elections is ongoing and of long standing occurence…

    So when will we see the collusion evidence

  5. More Russia probe developments:

  6. NOEL

     /  5th July 2018

    I’m fascinated by the focus on the differences in assesment by NAS v FBI/CIA.
    NAS is restricted to Sigint only. No surprises there.

  7. MaureenW

     /  5th July 2018

    There are many interesting threads to this tale – here is one where Comey shuts down an opportunity to provide Julian Assange with an immunity deal. The same Julian Assange who published the Clinton/Podesta emails and has not been interviewed by the Special Counsel as to where he obtained them from. Assange has always claimed not Russia nor russian operatives.

  8. Patzcuaro

     /  5th July 2018

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s