15 Comments

1. 

   Kitty Catkin

    /  5th June 2019

   I hope thatt no one in that photo drove to the protest or used a computer or phone to see where it was.

   Reply
2. 

   Kitty Catkin

    /  5th June 2019

   I hope that no one in the photo drove there or used a phone or computer to find out where it was.

   Reply
3. 

   Kitty Catkin

    /  5th June 2019

   .

   Reply
4. 

   Kitty Catkin

    /  5th June 2019

   ?

   Reply
   • 

     Kitty Catkin

      /  5th June 2019

     Bugger.

     Reply
     • 

       Gezza

        /  5th June 2019

       Good post. 👍🏼

       Reply
       • 

         Kitty Catkin

          /  5th June 2019

         I do my best 🙂

         Reply
         • 

           Gezza

            /  5th June 2019

           Covered much the same territory as a few of Lurchy’s but a lot more briefly.

           Reply
5. 

   Alan Wilkinson

    /  5th June 2019

   Climate Science = please give us more money.

   Reply
   • 

     Blazer

      /  5th June 2019

     get help.

     Reply
     • 

       Alan Wilkinson

        /  5th June 2019

       90% is just what I said. Probably more. But that’s ok if the few percent that isn’t yields useful, good results. Just don’t take the breathless media reports too seriously.

       Reply
       • 

         Griff.

          /  5th June 2019

         90% is just what I said. Probably more. But that’s ok if the few percent that isn’t yields useful, good results

         Biggest US coal company funded dozens of groups questioning climate change

         The filings also revealed funding for the George C Marshall Institute, the Institute for Energy Research, and the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, which are seen as industry front groups.
         The names of a number of well-known contrarian academics also feature in the Peabody filings, including Willie Soon, a researcher at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Soon has been funded almost entirely by the fossil fuel industry, receiving more than $1.2m from oil companies and utilities, but this was the first indication of Peabody funding.
         Soon and the Smithsonian did not respond to requests for comment.
         Richard Lindzen and Roy Spencer, two contrarian scientists who appeared for Peabody at hearings in Minnesota last month on the social cost of carbon, were also included in the bankruptcy filings.

         https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jun/13/peabody-energy-coal-mining-climate-change-denial-funding
         Well I never Dr Roy Spencer Ph.D Alans go to scientist is a paid shrill for the coal industry as are Lindzen and Soon .
         In fact almost all the contrarian scientists nutbars who publish the denial that Alan thinks is “Good science” take money from the fossil fuel industries for their nonsense.

         Before you start even more gibbering Alan to save you further embarrassment. .
         The IPCC scientists do not get paid a cent for the report Alan they are all volunteers who work for free.

         .
         ‘

         Reply
         • 

           Alan Wilkinson

            /  6th June 2019

           Your usual offensive drivel, Griff. Spencer set the record straight three years ago:
           https://www.drroyspencer.com/2016/06/no-spencers-research-wasnt-funded-by-peabody/

           And if you think the scientists writing IPCC report weren’t on safe taxpayer funding I have a harbour bridge to sell you.

           Reply
           • 

             Griff.

              /  6th June 2019

             You believe that twit without question?

             Dr Roy Spence PhD is.
             1 Religious nutbar.
             2 Paid by multiple sources to push his crap .
             3 On the 3% fringe of climate science.
             4 Had his published papers trashed multiple times.
             5 Had his own work at UHA corrected by others after he has repeatedly claimed it is the gold standard in temperature measurement .
             6 On recorded as saying he views his science output as a political tool.

             All these things have been pointed out to you with supporting links many times over
             Yet you still think a fringe dwelling nutbar with a horrific record of incompetent work {that is being polite } is a go to person to disputed the world scientific authority’s.

             1 https://cornwallalliance.org/

             We believe Earth and its ecosystems—created by God’s intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence —are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory. Earth’s climate system is no exception. Recent global warming is one of many natural cycles of warming and cooling in geologic history.

             God made it so we can not change it!
             This not a scientific position it is based purely on faith in an imaginary god. .
             CO2 is a green house gas.There is nothing natural or even god created about our burning of fossil fuels and the resulting alteration of the chemical balance in the atmosphere and warming of this planets surface.
             As Dr Roy Spencer PhD. is both on the board and a senior scientific adviser for the Cornwall alliance , he has not only sighed up to he is responsible for this religious based gibbering nonsense.

             2 3 4 5 6 https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Roy_Spencer
             https://www.desmogblog.com/roy-spencer
             https://www.facingsouth.org/2011/09/climate-science-contrarian-roy-spencers-oil-industry-ties.html
             5 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/may/11/more-errors-identified-in-contrarian-climate-scientists-temperature-estimates.
             i can provide plenty more links to confirm both Spencer’s funding sources and his ongoing incompetence.

             You poor easily lead right wing science denier.

             .
6. 

   Pink David

    /  5th June 2019

   It’s working already…

   https://i2.wp.com/www.williamofockham.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/img_6576.jpg?resize=646%2C1024&ssl=1

   Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.

Δ