The means testing of National Super argument again

National Superannuation is ‘universal’ – everyone from age 65 is eligible to receive it. While you don’t have to apply for it, presumably most people do once they turn 65.

The argument of whether it should be means tested keeps coming up, and it has recently.

RNZ: NZ Super costs up as NZ retirees on $100k passes 30,000

The number of New Zealand retirees getting their superannuation while earning more than $100,000 has topped 30,000 – costing taxpayers more than half a billion dollars each year.

Their table shows that as of 2017/18 that there were actually 31,048 people getting NZ Super.

Retirement Policy and Research Centre director Susan St John said the numbers were really an underestimate.

“It doesn’t count PIE (portfolio-investment entity) income and it also of course doesn’t count the capital gains many in those brackets will have enjoyed.”

Economist Shamubeel Eaqub said the figures weren’t surprising because a lot of people were continuing to work later in life and many had accumulated large amounts of wealth.

He wanted Super to be means tested – related to wealth and income.

He said based on the current fiscal year, and on the average Super payment being $19,592, not paying it to people on incomes of $100,000 or above would save taxpayers around $608m.

But $608 million is just a gross amount. For people on high incomes their Super will be effectively taxed at the highest rate of 33%, which totals about $200 million, so the net cost is $408 million – still substantial but well short of half a billion dollars.

An average Super payment of $19,592 surprises me. Here are the current rates:

  • Single: living alone $21,380
  • Single: Sharing $19,735
  • Married, civil union or de facto: one partner qualifies $16,446
  • Married, civil union or de facto: $16,446 each
  • Married, civil union or de facto couple: one partner qualifies and the other is included $15,631.50 each

A lot of people 65+ must be single. That will be more likely the older they get.

If the NZ Super is spent then much of it it will be taxed at a further 15% (GST).

People earning over $100k will be paying more tax than they receive in Super. Tax on an income of $100,000 is $23,920 which is more than nett Super (taxed at 33%):

  • Single: living alone $21,380 less 33% is $14,324.60
  • Single: Sharing $19,735 less 33% is $13,222.45
  • Married, civil union or de facto: $16,446 less 33% is $11,018.82

The point also often made that people earning larger incomes from age 65 are likely to have earned high incomes – and paid a lot of tax – over their lifetimes.

But this is all theoretical. There is no sign that Parliament or parties have any inclination to introduce means testing of National Super – especially in an election year.

Another approach to limiting the rising cost of Super is to increase the age of eligibility.

At the last election party policies were:

ACT

  • Raise the retirement age. Starting in 2020 we will raise the age of entitlement to Super from 65 to 67, at a rate of two months per year, finishing in 2032.
  • Trim back overly generous entitlements such as pensions after only ten years’ residency.
  • Read more here.

Green Party

  • Maintain universal New Zealand Superannuation for all New Zealanders 65 years and older, adjusted annually in accordance with movement in the Consumer Price Index.
  • The rate for a couple cannot fall below 65% of the average ordinary time weekly earnings or exceed 72.5 % of the average ordinary time weekly earnings.
  • The rate for a single person living alone is 65% of the rate for a couple, and the rate for a single person not living alone is 60% of that for a couple.
  • Identify ways to allow flexibility in the age a person may receive New Zealand Superannuation.
  • Oppose compulsory retirement savings.
  • Read more here.

– last year National proposed lifting it to 65 (by 2037).

Labour

  • Maintain the Superannuation age at 65, maintain Superannuation with inflation adjustments as at present, and restart contributions to the Super Fund.
  • Review the legislation around superannuation portability.
  • Read more here and here.

Maori Party

  • Amend existing retirement policy to enable all eligible retirees to take their superannuation at the full rate, earlier than the current eligibility age of 65 years.
  • Review and reset the eligibility criteria for accessing superannuation for Māori and Pacific and consider lowering the age to 63 until life expectancy outcomes for Māori and Pacific are the same as for non-Māori and non-Pacific.
  • Read more here.

Those proposals would increase the cost of Super, possibly substantially.

National

  • 750,000 superannuitants will receive a further increase on 1 April on top of their normal annual increase, with the couple rate going up by a further $680.
  • 15,000 superannuitants with high housing costs will benefit by an average of $1508 a year from 1 April 2018 from the changes to the Accommodation Supplement from the Family Incomes Package.
  • Increase the age of entitlement for New Zealand Superannuation from 65 to 67, starting in 2037.
  • Committed to resuming NZ Superannuation Fund contributions, so that everyone has certainty about saving for their retirement.
  • Tighten residency requirements, so that migrants moving to New Zealand from 2018 have to live here for 20 years before being eligible for Super.
  • Read more here and here.

NZ First

  • Maintain New Zealand Superannuation entitlement at 65 years, as a universal, non-contributory, publicly funded pension scheme with no means-testing.
  • Raise the minimum residency requirement for full New Zealand Superannuation from 10 to 25 years after age 20.
  • Superannuation applicants retain their overseas pensions without any deduction from their New Zealand Superannuation, or from their spouse’s, New Zealand Superannuation.
  • End the labyrinth of bureaucratic complexities and unfairness caused by existing reciprocal pension agreements with other countries; overseas pensions are no business of the New Zealand Government.
  • Restart taxpayer contributions to the NZ Superannuation Fund and end its taxation.
  • Read more here and here.

Parties may or may not amend these policies this year. National restated their intention to raise the age of eligibility last year: National would still raise super age to 67 in 2037 if elected, finance spokesman Paul Goldsmith says

No party has suggested means testing National Super, so perhaps it is a futile argument.

Leave a comment

8 Comments

  1. David

     /  1st March 2020

    Ardern took it a step further and is paying millionaire pensioners power bills over Winter regardless of if they are at home or not. Winston gives them free travel etc with his super gold card regardless of if the have a Ferrari in the garage.
    Its a vote rich environment and I think means testing wont ever happen here given that our super system is perfectly affordable, simple and effective. At iuts peak the cost is less than some countries are paying already and its thanks to Roger Douglas that NZ is in such a good retirement situation.

    Reply
    • Duker

       /  1st March 2020

      No one gets their ‘power bills’ paid …its just a benefit bump every week for 6 months or so to spend how you wish.

      Reply
      • David

         /  1st March 2020

        You know if you keep posting these sort of things people might ignore when you have something interesting to say. Not everything is literal, there is a nuance because its a blog not a court proceeding.

        Reply
    • Blazer

       /  1st March 2020

      ‘its thanks to Roger Douglas that NZ is in such a good retirement situation.’

      where do you get this drivel from…David?The man was a wrecking ball without one original idea .

      Reply
      • Gerrit

         /  1st March 2020

        And no government since (including Labour for nine looooooooooooooong years under Clark) has returned the country to Muldoon era accountancy and structural governance.

        Guess the wrecking ball did some good to knock down the old and enable the building of a better society.

        A better society that certainly needs tweaking but in general is 100% better than the command economy model so loved by Muldoon.

        Worth a read

        https://connectusfund.org/list-of-16-big-pros-and-cons-of-a-command-economy

        Reply
        • Duker

           /  2nd March 2020

          Australia was more gradual in its transition and that worked well and we would have been the same . No one says it should have stayed as the system created in the 1940s
          Indeed in some things because of constitutional provisions Australia still have employment arbitration and national awards for wages…which has certainly protected employee benefits.
          We can see now in features like Provincial Growth Fund a return to the previous regionalism where government would have a finger on the scale to assist the provinces who didnt have high population growth or high enough numbers under benefit cost ratios

          Reply
        • Blazer

           /  2nd March 2020

          ‘a better society’…that being a by product is questionable…home ownership dropping,inequality rising,debt ballooning,crime and incarceration rates increasing,are all evident since the neo liberal experiments of the 80’s.

          An over riding feature of course, the collapse of Capitalism as seen with the GFC….where socialism became the antidote.

          Reply
  1. The means testing of National Super argument again — Your NZ – NZ Conservative Coalition

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s