Another change the system wish list

Partly do to the major disruption our society and economy are going through and presumably partly due to some people having more spare time to think about and discuss things, there have been a number of policy wish lists published.

Of course some politicians have been having a go at the immediate future, like Simon Bridges:

But that’s fairly short term aiming to crank things back up to business as usual.

Like others KJT at The Standard thinks that the old way was stuffed and something radically different is required – What we were doing wasn’t working.

While the Government is flat out just trying to work through the current crisis it’s unlikely Labour would be any more keen than National in making major changes at this stage. That would be even more disruption and even more risk.

KJT suggests a number of idealist style policies:

  • Expanding Kiwibank, to undercut private banks and start to take back control of our money supply  from private banking, is a logical first step. Reducing the capital haemorrhage.
  • Support Government that has not been bought and paid for by international corporate interests.  From one that is only interested in extracting as much wealth as possible from us, before it is all gone, to one that has a vision for the future.
  • A financial transactions and/or capital flows tax, to discourage money speculation and offshore currency speculation.
  • The predatory Capital investment, mostly  from offshore, that has loaded our companies with so much excessive debt, to make short term profits, that they cannot sustain four weeks of lost earnings.
  • Capital gains taxes . Can be rebated for the family home to a certain value,  and for local productive investment. Make investing in NZ’s more attractive than land speculation, overseas securities or local finance scams.. Prices of speculative investments will probably drop, some inevitably with the present economic contraction, leaving some people with negative equity. Banks as one of the contributors who profited from the situation, should be made to bear the change in equity along with other investors.
  • A genuine emissions tax, which can be made economically neutral by spending on energy and resource efficiency in New Zealand, or  by giving it back as a general tax rebate.
  • Change the RBA away from the current single focus on inflation, allowing our dollar to drop to a natural level against overseas currencies, helping both exporters, job creation  and manufacturer’s within NZ.  (Fighting inflation with interest rates is like fighting a fire with petrol. Works briefly and then there is an explosion.).
  • Refuse to enter trade agreements that constrain what NZ can do on its own.
  • An expanding population also requires growth. Increasing the standard of education of women and free contraception are both proven, ethical and non-coercive answers to slow increasing population.

Increasing New Zealands population, 20% in 16 years, by immigration, or increasing birth rates, to give an illusion of economic growth, is obviously not an answer.

Closing wishes:

Government can spend money into the economy for sustainable energy and efficient resource use. (Invest in the future of New Zealand) There is no reason why we cannot borrow against ourselves, as an investment for our kids future, instead of paying interest to a private bank.  Such spending is no more  inflationary  than borrowing from an overseas bank.

Increasing equality, will make such solutions more politically acceptable, as there will be less pain to the majority in the transition..

There will be plenty of spare capacity, in our economy, for some time to come.

Lastly. Look at “just transitions” to a more sustainable future, so workers, including those who do the unpaid work in our society, are not loaded with all the costs of changes. https://www.mbie.govt.nz/business-and-employment/economic-development/just-transition/ while others, who haven’t contributed, run away with the profit.

Leave a comment

15 Comments

  1. David

     /  15th April 2020

    If we want treasury,s worst case scenario to come to pass this is definitely the way to go.

    Reply
    • KJT patronisingly assumes that fewer women than men are at university, when it’s the other way around. Is KJT aware that women were going to university in the 19th century and were doctors from the 1850s?

      Reply
  2. Blazer

     /  15th April 2020

    Hard to disagree with that list.
    It makes so much sense politicians will not have a bar of it….especially as it threatens the status quo and the born to rule, wealthy parasites they rely on for funding.

    Reply
    • There’s a reason why our economic and social systems have evolved to what they are now – overall they have been successful at raising the standard of living and wellbeing of most people, albeit unevenly.

      As far as I’m aware no one has implemented a radically different economic system to anywhere near the same level of success.

      There is much less risk improving on a working system as opposed to switching to something that is untested or more flawed.

      Reply
      • Blazer

         /  15th April 2020

        Can you just briefly outline this ‘system’ and how it works?
        Much appreciated.

        Reply
        • Duker

           /  15th April 2020

          See below
          ..
          You’re welcome

          Reply
          • Blazer

             /  15th April 2020

            hopeless.

            Reply
            • Duker

               /  15th April 2020

              You have been proved wrong ( not a bar of it) and out of touch with how anything works.
              Maybe those new Ed TV programs could be useful for you

            • Blazer

               /  15th April 2020

              @Duker…don’t get excited..you taking one line out of context ,just proves how hopeless you really…are.

            • Duker

               /  15th April 2020

              Dear Blazer
              How about you take ONE item from the list you love and give a 200 word rundown of the problem it will solve and why it matters.
              At least I made one point and backed it up, while you still think some flannel – at a the level which is written on a xmas card will suffice.. and your collected works of Enver Hoxha arent much help

  3. Duker

     /  15th April 2020

    “Change the RBA away from the current single focus on inflation”

    Somehow the people calling for change never notice it when change has occurred. They arent really That interested . There seems to be widespread ignorance of this change

    Reserve Bank Act
    “8 Function to formulate monetary policy through MPC
    (1)The Bank, acting through the MPC, has the function of formulating a monetary policy directed to the economic objectives of—
    (a)achieving and maintaining stability in the general level of prices over the medium term; and
    (b)supporting maximum sustainable employment.

    http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1989/0157/latest/DLM199892.html

    Reply
  4. Wayne Mapp

     /  15th April 2020

    The lists by KJT are terrible.Basically it would be “lets crash the economy completely”. Now is not the time for far reaching change. The economy pre covid was doing pretty well. Not perfect, but pretty well. Trying to impose radical change at the very time it is imploding would kill many more businesses than will already be killed.

    Obviously some changes will be necessary. I would argue for a 40% tax rate on income above $120,000.

    Reply
    • Blazer

       /  15th April 2020

      What do you think the present National hierarchy and their business masters would think about that suggestion?

      Reply
  5. Conspiratoor

     /  15th April 2020

    A tsunami of common sense wrapped in one sentence…

    “Increasing New Zealands population, 20% in 16 years, by immigration, or increasing birth rates, to give an illusion of economic growth, is obviously not an answer.”

    KJT channeling Bruce Beetham. Although to be fair the world’s soon-to-be largest economy rests on it…

    “A financial transactions and/or capital flows tax, to discourage money speculation and offshore currency speculation”

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s