There has already been discussion here about the petition directed at TVNZ to ‘GET RID OF HOSKING’.
I don’t like watching Mike Hosking on Seven Sharp so I hardly ever watch him or any of the show.
Anyone has a right to start up a petition about anything they choose, but I think that campaigns to try and force television presenters out of their jobs is stupid. If I thought it might be an effective way to shut down voices that people didn’t like I would condemn it as anti-free speech.
But the petition is just as likely to boost interest in Seven Sharp and Hosking so he and TVNZ may actually benefit.
Petitioning Minster of Broadcasting NZ Hon Amy Adams MP and 3 others
Get Rid of Hosking
GET RID OF HOSKING. [ It is our opinion ] TVNZ broadcaster Mike Hosking is an offensive and thoughtless media personality who continues to arrogantly and ignorantly disregard the struggles of everyday New Zealander’s. Hosking’s attitude and comments continuously cause offense, upset and disdain to reasonable and innocent people ; both viewers and non-viewers of TVNZ. Supporters of GET RID OF HOSKING expect that TVNZ acts as a responsible and mature public broadcaster and respects this request from thousands of New Zealanders – That is – We no longer wish to see or hear any more from Hosking on our TV screens.
This petition will be delivered to:
- Minster of Broadcasting NZ
Hon Amy Adams MP
Kevin Kenrick CEO and Jeff Latch Director of Content TVNZ
- Broadcasting Standards Authority
Broadcasting Standards Authority
- ASB BANK Executive General Manager Marketing & Communications at ASB
ASB BANK – Roger Beaumont
There are currently 18,115 supporters.
I guess it’s ok that the petition is aimed at TVNZ. It’s up to them whether they take any notice of it.
Although it depends on to what extent pressure is put on TVNZ to dump a presenter. If it goes to the extent of a campaign to boycott TVNZ I would be concerned.
A similar campaign was waged against TV3 over their axing of John Campbell. That appeared to affect their ratings, which in turn could impact on their viability.
I would be disturbed if a TV company or public broadcaster was shut down because of campaigns against them. This would significantly reduce options for free speech.
Why has the Minister been included? I would be appalled if a Minister intervened in TVNZ decisions on how presents their shows.
Why is the Broadcasting Standards Authority included? I would be appalled if they tried to tell TVNZ who they should or shouldn’t have as presenters.
The ANZ Bank being included has an insidious angle. Attacking a major sponsor could potentially have a significant effect on the financial viability of part of TVNZ’s operation.
A couple of contrasting blog views on this.
Kiwiblog: The haters of freedom of speech
I’m tempted to call these people cultural fascists.
First of all do they really think the bloody Government should decide who is and is not allowed to appear on television as a broadcaster?
Secondly they seem to hate views they disagree with, and want Hosking gone because he says things they don’t like.
I think NZ is better when it has diversity of views on air – I think it is good both Hosking and Campbell are broadcasters.
But these cultural fascists hate views that are not their own, and think the Government should decide who is allowed to be on air. They can get f****d.
The Standard: Dirty Politics Farrar and freedom of speech
In another fine example of the Streisand effect, poor wee Dirty Politics Farrar doesn’t like it.
Not being one for self-reflection, DPF hates views that are not his own and thinks they shouldn’t be expressed. Or perhaps he just doesn’t understand what free speech is.
It’s good that both Farrar and ‘Natwatch’ have the freedom to speak about this as they see fit.
Should Mike Hosking be shut up because many of us don’t like what he says? I don’t think so.
Who is Dan Wayman? He is a lawyer, sometimes from Wellington. Stuff has some information on him and his motives:
Wayman, who describes himself as a New Zealand-enrolled barrister-solicitor who divides his time between New Zealand and Shanghai, where he works at the British Consulate, says he started the petition because he “just felt something needed to be done really”.
“[Hosking’s] socially irresponsible comments are damaging to the New Zealand public, and especially as the face of the national broadcaster in the 7pm timeslot, being a family show, I think it’s harmful for the next generation to receive those types of sentiments from Mr Hosking.”
Seven Sharp is a family show? I can’t imagine that many young people would watch it. An increasing number of young people watch little or no broadcast television.
Wayman said comments made by Hosking over the crowdfunding purchase of the Awaroa beach and over the New Zealand flag debate as examples of why the broadcaster should be removed from TVNZ.
Wayman said: “It’s the constant lack of empathy and dismissive comments of New Zealanders struggling, even following stories on Seven Sharp – he just does not get it, and I think it’s harmful.”
“The ultimate goal is to have a more appropriate face on the national broadcaster in the 7pm slot,” he says. “That’s the ultimate goal. I’m not worried about his radio career, but I think the platform that he’s got (with Seven Sharp) – he’s not the right person for that platform.”
“We welcome feedback on our programmes, which we get in the form of daily audience ratings, quantitative and qualitative market research, and direct feedback from viewers. Given we engage with around 2.5 million New Zealanders per day, we typically get a broad range of views expressed about our on-air and online content. There are a number of viewing options.Seven Sharp is the most watched show at 7pm.”
There are a number of viewing and doing options at 7 pm Dan. As a lawyer don’t you value free choice and free speech?