Audrey Young writes Peters’ case highlights an abuse of the ‘no surprises’ policy
No story with Winston Peters at the centre of it was ever going to be a one-day wonder.
And it just got a whole lot more serious.
There are disturbing and unanswered questions about his superannuation overpayment, whether you think he is the victim of a media beat-up, or are not willing to accept his assurance it was an error without proof.
The Government is now at the centre of the controversy after an admission by Social Development Minister Anne Tolley to the Herald.
She said she was told on August 15 by an official about MSD’s private meeting with Peters and what the subject of the meeting was – well after the meeting, well after he had paid back the money.
She was technically told under the “no surprises” policy, in which the public service chiefs and SOE boards forewarn ministers of issues that could suddenly become news and which will require their response. The “and” is important.
The fact that Tolley is unwilling to discuss the issue any further because it is a private matter is evidence enough that she should not have been told in the first place.
It is an abuse of the no-surprises policy. No minister should have been privy to that sort of information any more than the Health Minister should receive reports on any hip replacement operation Peters might have.
If Tolley had no expectation of receiving such information, she should say so publicly and conclude that the ministry’s decision was a misjudgment.
If she doesn’t, it is safe to assume that she and ministers have created an expectation they should get information like that.
This on it’s own is an important issue.
But, especially with Peters on the warpath, there are possible serious repercussions in the short term.
What Tolley did with the information is not yet clear, nor how far up the chain it went and whether National’s black ops guys are back in business.
But the very fact it was fed to the Beehive will cause suspicion by Peters that National leaked the information to discredit him.
It was obvious that some suspicion would fall on National. So if someone in National is responsible for the leak it would have been very stupid – stupid isn’t uncommon when politics gets dirty.
If National are found to be responsible, or even just widely perceived to have probably been involved, it could be very damaging for their election chances, and for their chances of negotiating a coalition with Winston Peters.
Other possibilities shouldn’t be ruled out. Because it was predictable that National would be implicated they could have been set up here.
I don’t think Winston has has embarrassed himself.
Who would do that? Who has been gunning for National and English for months?
Yesterday morning on Whale Oil Face of the Day:
But what you have here is one of Bill English’s failed hit jobs. Leaked via Tolley, the NZ Herald has tried to make it stick.
Don’t you love election time?
Oh, and it’s not dirty politics if they don’t use blogs.
That’s an accusation yesterday that it was “leaked via Tolley”. Even if it was someone seems to have leaked that information to Whale Oil. They could just have easily leaked straight to Whale Oil.
And being unable to resist bragging Whale oil has more today: “The Herald can reveal” something Whaleoil published yesterday
It was leaked to “the media” days after it was “leaked to Whaleoil”. We sat on it for the weekend, but first thing Monday morning, we wrote…
…what I have quoted above.
And as we know about the New Zealand Herald, first they will take the leak and make it a story and then they make the leaker a story. Two stories for the price of one, especially when the first hit fails. Winston ends up being the victim here instead of the villain.
God what a bunch of amateurs on the 9th floor. Especially Eagleson. You’d think he’d have learned a thing or two back in the day. It seems not.
Now they are all running for cover and doing Sgt Shultz impressions. And you know what I always say: It’s not the original offence, it’s the cover-up that gets you.
Anne Tolley will have been told she’ll be looked after if things get too bad. You see, it’s never the likes of Eagleson or English that will go down for this. Releasing private MSD information on a political opponent is a career ending move. And Tolley was told to do it.
Whenever John Key phoned he always made sure that I was to know that if Wayne called me that he was for all intents and purposes the same as Key… He would say “When Wayne speaks he speaks for me”.
So now Tolley has been told to hang in there. She’ll be ok. Just look how that worked out for Jason Ede and Todd Barclay.
She has this morning to throw Eagleson under the bus and save her career. Doubt she will have the smarts to do it.
Bill English is causing a lot of stress inside National. As I predicted he is effing up the unlosable election and loyalty becomes paper-thin once people feel their own jobs are on the line.
If I knew about this before the Herald did, just think about how unhappy the people around Bill must be.
Of course, I decided to sit on it for a bit. No point helping Bill out. He’s too busy working his way into opposition. Attacking Winston Peters like this has all but assured a Labour/NZ First government.
And I say this without a trace of smugness or satisfaction: you all didn’t believe me. You thought it was personal. I told you Bill English is exactly what you are seeing now. He was the wrong man for the job. And I will not vote for National while he is in charge of it. The man is not capable of being a party leader.
His real problem is that he’s lost the confidence of his team. I knew days before the Herald knew. And the Herald was leaked to as well. These are the hallmarks of a power structure crumbling and falling to dust.
Whale Oil claims it was leaked to them first and they did nothing with it. That seems out of character going by past attention seeking.
They could be right, they could have been informed before anyone else, did nothing about it and waited to let it all turn to custard, then claim bragging rights afterwards.
If so then National deserves to be dumped in disgrace.
But at this stage I would prefer to keep an open mind on who is responsible.
What is most credible?
That National would blatantly abuse privacy in a political hit job knowing the spotlight would be on them, and knowing there was a huge political risk?
Or that Whale Oil would bring down the Government they have openly been trying to undermine and destroy for years – pretty much since National cut Cameron Slater loose after Dirty Politics broke during the last election campaign.
Slater has been noticeably out of the political loop for a long time, but suddenly he claims to know everything that has happened and everyone responsible.
That flashes some warning lights to me. he has a habit of throwing around incriminating and false claims.
There’s certainly dirty politics going on here. What’s not so clear is who is actually responsible.
There is a lot to clear up here. One that could do with clarification – Tolley is MSD. Peters claims that the leak came from IRD.
