There have been contrasting responses to the news of the death of Fidel Castro. A hero who stood up to the US, or a brutal dictator? Both.
Castro is a controversial and divisive world figure.
He is decorated with various international awards, and his supporters laud him as a champion of socialism and anti-imperialism whose revolutionary regime secured Cuba’s independence from American imperialism.
Conversely, critics view him as a totalitarian dictator whose administration oversaw multiple human-rights abuses, an exodus of more than one million Cubans, and the impoverishment of the country’s economy.
Through his actions and his writings he has significantly influenced the politics of various individuals and groups across the world.
In Browning can’t understand why Cuban exiles are celebrating Castro’s death David Farrar points out a Facebook comment of Green MP Stefan Browning.
I’m saddened by the death of Fidel Castro. He represented so significantly the battle against the worst of the forces of capitalist greed and the tyranny of oppression by the USA industrial military complex. Cuba has problems but its achievements and humanitarian reach have been significant too, especially considering the blockades and measures against it. I was disappointed by this Stuff announcement that has so much about those celebrating Fidel’s passing, when millions will be mourning.
Fans of socialism have turned a blind eye to some appalling un-democratic, authoritarian and brutal leaders.
I’m saddened by the fact an MP who has never had to live under an authoritarian dictatorship praises it so much and can’t understand who the hundreds of thousands who actually lived under it despised it.
Castro imprisoned gays, killed political opponents, tortured prisoners, censored the Internet, banned trade unions, made strikes illegal etc etc. But because he was an enemey of the US, Browning thinks he was a great guy.
Browning is attracting huge negative feedback on his Facebook page for his tears of sadness at the death of an authoritarian dictator.
Even on the left there has been a very mixed reaction to Castro’s death.
The Standard: Fidel Castro has died
Cuba is a unique place with some weaknesses and problems but with other features that are outstanding.
RIP Fidel Castro.
That was under the authorship of ‘Notices and Features’ so someone chose not to put their own name to it. There was some support and also harsh criticism of Castro’s legacy.
Martyn Bradbury: Rest in Revolution Fidel Castro
2016 has been a shit year, and it continues to find ways to keep killing off all my heroes, this time 2016 has managed to wrestle life from the Godfather of the Revolution, Fidel Castro…
…and the World lost an idea that common people could join together and fight the forces of Capitalism with weapons if need be.
A revolutionary hero just turned up at the pearly gates demanding a meeting with the workers – Rest in Revolution Fidel.
That must be the workers Castro didn’t torture or murder. It’s odd that Bradbury should suggest castro has arrived at the ‘pearly gates’ when thought that religious beliefs were backward and viewed the Roman Catholic church as ” a reactionary, pro-capitalist institution” (however Castro ended up organising a visit to Cuba by the Pope in 1998).
Is a Castro type revolution what Bradbury keeps trying to talk up for New Zealand?
Comments at The Daily Blog were also a mix of praise and condemnation.