Dave Cull, Dunedin mayor and also president of Local Government New Zealand, has suggested that a regional fuel tax ”might” be something that could be used outside Auckland, both other Otago mayors have different ideas on raising more money.
ODT: Regional fuel tax might work: Cull
Dunedin Mayor Dave Cull says a fuel tax such as that proposed for Auckland may be something that could raise money for infrastructure in Dunedin, but mayors in the rest of the region have not supported the idea.
Mr Cull pointed to the Port Chalmers cycle/walkway as one project a regional fuel tax could help pay for.
He said such a tax was appropriate for funding transportation infrastructure, but other mechanisms would be more appropriate for other needs.
”Across the country there are instances where there are transportation infrastructure needs, and there’s even money within the NZ Transport Agency available, but there’s not sufficient resource in the local body to match the funding, so nothing happens.”
The cycle/walkway to Port Chalmers was an example where a lack of resources was the problem.
”That would be a candidate for that sort of funding.”
”It’s about all road users contributing to make the whole system safer and more efficient.”
It seems to be more about trying to find ways of funding projects without having to keep raising rates so much.
The amount of money spent on cycleways and the disruption to traffic is already a contentious issue in Dunedin. Hundreds of car parks in or near the CBD have been removed or are planned to be removed to make way for cycle lanes on streets, including on both main streets running right through the city.
There is low usage of the cycle lanes. I was talking to someone yesterday who was parked for half an hour on state highway one during the busiest traffic time of day, and they saw three cyclists. I daily drive on streets where all car parks have been converted to cycle lanes that are only occasionally used by cyclists, most days I see none.
I think that fuel is already quite a bit more expensive down here. Slapping a tax on it to fund pet council projects would likely be very unpopular.
Other mayors in the area want more money other than from rate hikes but not from a fuel tax.
Queenstown Lakes Mayor Jim Boult…
…said the fuel tax might work for Auckland but not for Queenstown, which had 5million visitor nights and just 16,000 ratepayers.
”Large numbers of people fly in here on aeroplanes, arriving on tour coaches, so their ability to contribute to our economy is limited through a petrol tax.”
Instead, he wanted a visitor levy, something he had said before ”constantly”.
Central Otago Mayor Tim Cadogan…
…said the area’s fuel was already more expensive than Auckland’s, so he did not support a fuel tax.
Paying for expensive infrastructure was a problem.
The planned Cromwell wastewater treatment plant had a budget of $10 million and the Lake Dunstan water supply project would cost up to $17 million.
”We’ve got 20,000 people living here; that’s pretty tough.”
Using a fuel tax to pay fore waste water treatment and water supply would be ridiculous. Cromwell is increasingly popular for tourists, and also operates as a satellite town for Queenstown and Wanaka. It is also the centre of a thriving wine region.
Clutha Mayor Bryan Cadogan…
…said local government ”needs something”, but he did not support a fuel tax.
The issue Clutha had was paying for infrastructure related to its tourism industry, which was ”not as advanced as most”.
The area had a declining and ageing population and the council could not keep going back to them for more money.
”It just seems so simple to put a tax on for tourists when they come in. We need it, and we need it now.”
Clutha District includes the Catlins area that is increasingly popular for tourists (for good reason, it’s a great area to visit).
However all these areas have different situations and needs.
Fuel is already taxed heavily in New Zealand:
- 59.524 cents – National Land Transport Fund
- 6 cents – ACC Motor Vehicle Account
- 0.66 cents – Local Authorities Fuel Tax
- 0.3 cents – Petroleum or Engine Fuels Monitoring Levy
- 9.9726 cents GST on the above taxes
We pay a total of 26 cents GST on $2 of petrol (diesel is taxed differently).
Just under a half of the cost of fuel is tax already.
It is now government policy for all of the petrol excise tax motorists pay to be directed to the National Land Transport Fund for investment back into New Zealand’s road and transport system. The AA lobbied hard on behalf of motorists for many years to have all the taxes devoted to road building and maintenance, road safety education and enforcement, and subsidies for public transport.
Previously, about 19 cents per litre of the tax motorists paid on petrol was diverted by the government to non-road and transport related projects.
For far too long there has been significant under-investment in the nation’s road and transport network, and tax diversion has been unfair and at the expense of motorists.
Motorists must not be selectively taxed or treated as an easy source of tax revenue to pay for projects that would be more fairly funded by other sources such as rates or general taxation.
We don’t support regional petrol levies that unfairly target motorists to subsidise the transport decisions of others. The future funding of public transport must not be another tax on motorists added to current taxes and charges, but has to be independently justified in terms of defined benefits to motorists.
Back to Cull:
On the Government’s commitment to reviewing local government costs and revenue, Mr Cull said LGNZ had been saying the revenue stream from rating property was not sustainable.
Perhaps it is extravagant spending wishes of councils that is unsustainable.
One could cynically suggest that mayors and councillors want to divert attention from them raising rates far more than inflation.
Our fuel is already taxed heavily. Perhaps mayors need to look more at user pays – but that’s never likely to happen for cyclists.
There’s a good case for some cycleways. A recently partly built harbour side cycleway here in Dunedin is popular and well used – mostly recreationally. One problem is the escalating cost of extending this all the way to Port Chalmers – estimates have over doubled.
Were initial estimates hopeless, or do rules and regulations and ideal requirements blow out the costs? There are suggestions that cycleway construction is lucrative because councils pay whatever it takes. The Dunedin Council wasted half a million dollars on a poorly designed cycleway that had to be redesigned and is still hardly used.
Getting sensible mayors, councillors and planners may be more important than finding ways to hide how much we are increasingly taxed and rated.
Talking of rates – they are about $2000 a year for an average house in Dunedin – how does that compare to elsewhere?
